Files
Abstract
Utilising primary survey data, this paper evaluates the relationships between a set of supplier
development strategies and performance within the milk industry in Armenia and Ukraine.
Improving supplier performance is a critical task for the dairy industry in the Former Soviet
Union as, during the 1990s both the quantity and quality of agricultural output deteriorated
sharply. Fragmented supply chains led to high transaction costs and, in some cases, market failure.
Drawing on the work of Krause et al. (2000) and Doney and Cannon (1997), a theoretical
framework is presented that proposes that, either directly or indirectly, supplier assessment strategies,
supplier incentives, competitive pressure, direct involvement, and trust between buyers
and sellers, lead to improvements in supplier performance. Data from 618 milk producers were
analysed by structural equation modelling to test ten research hypotheses. All relationships are
significant except those related to supplier assessment. In particular, the results indicate that
both trust and competitive pressure have a direct and positive impact on performance improvement.
Trust can be fostered by buyers providing feedback and performance data to suppliers.
In contrast, direct involvement strategies are negatively related to performance improvement
and weaken farmers’ trust. Implications for managers are discussed along with suggestions for
further research.