Files
Abstract
This working paper utilises the choice modelling technique to investigate how information and
understanding influences preferences of the general public for conservation of natural
environments, specifically the tropical waterways and wetlands of the Kimberley region in Western
Australia. The paper forms part of a larger study investigating preference divergence for
environmental systems between experts and non-experts. By priming the public with more
information about complex environmental problems, one might expect them to form preferences
similar to that of experts. A preliminary analysis of public low and high information samples finds
that, when birds and plants are the focus of species conservation with respect to the tropical
waterways, increased information does not significantly impact preferences. However, when fish
species conservation is considered significant differences are found. In this instance individuals
appear to have reacted favourably to the additional information, recognising that rare species
require more protection than widespread iconic species by placing higher values on their
conservation. Generally speaking, respondents preferred high levels of conservation improvements
over all attributes considered, rather than lower incremental improvements. Results should be
interpreted with care as further analysis is required, including investigation of the alternative specific
constant and inclusion of individual characteristics to explain sample heterogeneity.