Files
Abstract
This paper conveniently skips any controversy associated with the science of climate
change. On the assumption that greenhouse gas emissions are causing climate change that
is detrimental to humanity, the paper focuses on some economic dimensions of the issue
which seem to be poorly understood by Australian media commentators, policy analysts,
interest groups and the political parties. Using a neoclassical welfare economics
framework the paper explores the costs and benefits of greenhouse gas abatement with
reference to the findings of the Stern Report, the setting of greenhouse gas targets by
Australian political parties, the danger of the government “picking winners” and the
emerging carbon theory of value. The paper concludes with a brief review of the relative
merits of a carbon tax and a cap and trade approach.
Key Words: This paper conveniently skips any controversy associated with the science of climate
change. On the assumption that greenhouse gas emissions are causing climate change that
is detrimental to humanity, the paper focuses on some economic dimensions of the issue
which seem to be poorly understood by Australian media commentators, policy analysts,
interest groups and the political parties. Using a neoclassical welfare economics
framework the paper explores the costs and benefits of greenhouse gas abatement with
reference to the findings of the Stern Report, the setting of greenhouse gas targets by
Australian political parties, the danger of the government “picking winners” and the
emerging carbon theory of value. The paper concludes with a brief review of the relative
merits of a carbon tax and a cap and trade approach.