Files
Abstract
The inclusion of a minimum viable population in bioeconomic modeling creates at least two
complications that are not resolved by using a modified logistic growth function. The first
complication can be dealt with by choosing a different depensational growth function. The
second complication relates to the inclusion of the in situ benefits of wildlife into the analysis.
Knowledge about the magnitude of the in situ benefits provides no guide for policy about
conservation management. Simply knowing that people are willing to pay a large amount
each year to protect a species says nothing about whether one should manage habitat to
protect or enhance the species’ numbers, unless the species is in imminent danger of
extinction. If willingness to pay is to be a guide, it needs to be better tied to population
numbers, especially the minimum viable population.