CONGRESSIONAL VOTING ON FARM PAYMENT LIMITATIONS: POLITICAL PRESSURE OF IDEOLOGICAL CONVICTION?

The determinants of House and Senate votes on congressional amendments to limit payments to farmers are investigated. One concern is that campaign contributions may influence politicians' votes. Lobbying activity, as attempts to distinguish ideological motivations from passive constituency pressures suffer from theoretical and empirical shortcomings. So-called ideologically based decisions may reflect the ideology of the congressman's constituents rather than independent action on the basis of exogenous beliefs, while this ideology may itself be determined by politicoeconomic factors. A simultaneous relationship between money and votes is found in the House, but not in the Senate.


Issue Date:
1997-12
Publication Type:
Journal Article
DOI and Other Identifiers:
Record Identifier:
https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/30854
PURL Identifier:
http://purl.umn.edu/30854
Published in:
Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 22, 2
Page range:
281-295
Total Pages:
15




 Record created 2017-04-01, last modified 2019-08-26

Fulltext:
Download fulltext
PDF

Rate this document:

Rate this document:
1
2
3
 
(Not yet reviewed)