Files
Abstract
Recent studies have examined the relationships between agricultural innovations and rural poverty
in LDCs, concentrating on either exchange or nonexchange inoome. However, neither approach is adequate if
employed independently. Growing concen~ration of control of land and the effects. of components of new
agricultural technology on ancillary resources are docwnented for Bangladesh. Access to land and other natural
resources by the rural poor is gradually diminishing. Increasing landlessness and near landlessness have resulted in
greater dependence on wage employment for subsistence. However, agricultural wages, being close to the
subsistence level, provide little scope for carry-over into periods of slack agrirultural activity. Even though real
wages may be trending upwards slightly. much of their effect on rural poverty is neutralized because of seasonality
in employment and real wages. The nonexchange component of income is important in slack periods and may
become critical in abnormal years when both real wages and employment fall sharply. With rapid population
growth and resource depletion and greater penerration of technological and market forces, access to natural resources
with a cushioning effect on the rural poor in adverse circumstances has become more limited and income security
has been undennlned.