Format | |
---|---|
BibTeX | |
MARCXML | |
TextMARC | |
MARC | |
DublinCore | |
EndNote | |
NLM | |
RefWorks | |
RIS |
Files
Abstract
"Designing Green Support Programs" is the second in a series of reports on Green
Support Programs from the Henry A. Wallace Institute for Alternative Agriculture.
The first report in this series, "Lean, Mean and Green .. Designing Farm Support
Programs in a New Era," by Sarah Lynch and Katherine R. Smith, provides a broad
overview of the concept of Green Support Programs (GSP). A GSP would combine in
one program the dual objectives of supporting farmers income and providing environmental
protection from agricultural pollution. "Lean, Mean and Green ... " identifies
critical decisions that must be made in designing a GSP and explores the implications
and trade-offs of alternative program designs.
"Designing Green Support Programs" provides an in-depth analysis of several of the
critical decisions that must be made in designing a GSP. In the first paper of this
volume, Sarah Lynch provides a brief overview of agriculture's environmental problems
and highlights some of the strengths and weaknesses of alternative approaches to
addressing these problems. Ralph E. Heimlich explores the geographic distribution of
potential agroenvironmental problems and discusses the implications of this distribution
on program targeting to enhance cost-effectiveness. The issue of incentive
compatibility between existing farm programs and a GSP is examined by C. Ford
Runge. Sandra Batie discusses the availability of sustainable, environmentally friendly
alternative technologies and production practices, and barriers to their adoption.
Finally, Jerry Skees explores program administration issues that must be confronted
when designing and implementing a GSP.
Collectively, these papers' add considerable depth to our understanding of the important
issues and trade-offs that must be considered in designing a GSP. In so doing
they inform the on-going debate over the strengths and limitations of GSPs and the
potential role they might play in the next generation of farm programs.