Format | |
---|---|
BibTeX | |
MARCXML | |
TextMARC | |
MARC | |
DublinCore | |
EndNote | |
NLM | |
RefWorks | |
RIS |
Files
Abstract
The regional impacts of economic development incentives are
studied in the context of a computable general equilibrium (CGE) model.
The object is to evaluate the effectiveness of several incentives used to attract
new businesses in the city of Pueblo, Colorado. The results show
that the regional benefits of these incentives are relatively small, and the
net benefits to the local population when all impacts are accounted for
are likely to be negative. Instead, the benefits are largely transferred to
new businesses and employees who migrate to the region in response to
the incentives. Contrary to perceptions about the multiplier impacts of
economic development, the net impact on the local manufacturing sector
is negative as well. The incentives cause a substitution effect, as investment
is shifted toward export-oriented manufacturing sectors that are
favored for economic development. These results address the seeming
paradox that economic development can attract new businesses and jobs,
yet be unpopular enough among local residents for them to vote against
continuing it.