Files
Abstract
Business and financial records for 2003 from 201 New York dairy farm businesses are summarized
and analyzed. This analysis demonstrates the use of cash accounting with accrual adjustments to measure
farm profitability, financial performance, and costs of producing milk. Traditional methods of analyzing
dairy farm businesses are combined with evaluation techniques that show the relationship between good
management performance and financial success.
The farms in the project averaged 314 cows per farm and 22,302 pounds of milk sold per cow,
which represent above average size and management level for New York dairy farms. Net farm income
excluding appreciation, which is the return to the operator's labor, management, capital, and other unpaid
family labor, averaged $37,978 per farm. The rate of return to all capital invested in the farm business
including appreciation averaged 3.3 percent.
Differences in profitability between farms continue to widen. Average net farm income excluding
appreciation of the top 10 percent of farms was $250,155, while the lowest 10 percent was a negative
$145,107. Rates of return on equity with appreciation ranged from 36 percent to negative 25 percent for the
highest 10 percent and the lowest 10 percent of farms, respectively.
Large freestall farms averaged the highest milk output per cow and per worker, the lowest total cost
of production and investment per cow, and the greatest returns to labor, management and capital. Farms
milking three times a day (3X) were larger, produced more milk per cow and had higher net incomes than
herds milking two times per day (2X). Operating costs per hundredweight of milk were $0.82 per
hundredweight higher for 3X than 2X milking herds, while output per cow was 4,484 pounds higher. In
2003, farms supplementing the herd with bovine somatotropin (bST) attained higher rates of milk production
per cow, had larger herds and were more profitable than farms not supplementing with bST for all measures
other than labor and management income per operator. Farms adopting rotational grazing generally
produced less milk per cow than non-grazing farms but had lower costs of production and higher
profitability. One should not conclude that adoption of these technologies alone were responsible for
differences in performance.