Files
Abstract
This paper explores and compares the impact of different types of public spending on rural
household welfare in Ethiopia. The analysis of public financial and household-level data reveals that
returns to road investments are significantly higher than returns to other spending, but are much more
variable across regions. This regional variability in returns to road investment suggests that the
government should carefully consider region-differentiated investment priorities. Some evidence suggests
that the returns to road spending are increasing over time, with higher returns to road investments seen in
areas with better-developed road networks. Among the other types of public spending, the household
expenditure impacts of per capita public expenditure in agriculture and education are smaller, but these
effects are also less variable across regions than the effects of road infrastructure spending. The largest
effects of agricultural expenditures on rural households are observed in the most urbanized regions,
pointing to the potentially important impact of market proximity on returns to public interventions in
agriculture. Despite the importance of agriculture to the economy of Ethiopia we found that returns to
agricultural spending were fairly low, suggesting the need for further research into the drivers of
efficiency and effectiveness of public investments in this important sector.