000313601 001__ 313601 000313601 005__ 20250401110242.0 000313601 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.22004/ag.econ.313601 000313601 037__ $$a2393-2021-2681 000313601 041__ $$aeng 000313601 245__ $$aHeavy Grain Exports in Voyage-Chartered Ships: Rates and Volume 000313601 260__ $$c1968-01 000313601 269__ $$a1968-01 000313601 300__ $$a46 000313601 336__ $$aReport 000313601 490__ $$aMarketing Research Report No. 812 000313601 520__ $$aReport Introduction: Between 1961 and 1965, the United States exported 165 million long tons of heavy grain--corn, wheat, and soybeans. The average value of this trade was about $2 billion annually, approximately half from wheat exports alone. The cost of shipping grain by ocean freight has a marked influence on the competitive position of the United States in world grain markets. Also, differences in rates affect the competitive positions of the various coasts as shipping points, and the interregional competition of the producing areas. However, the free market nature of ocean freight rates for bulk commodities makes it difficult to obtain information on the general level of rates for grain shipments, their behavior over time, and the degree to which shipping rates from one coast affect shipping rates from the other coasts. The U.S. Department of Agriculture conducted this study to provide such information. In it, the causes of rate fluctuations were explored and a general theory of rate behavior was developed. 000313601 546__ $$aEnglish 000313601 650__ $$aCrop Production/Industries 000313601 650__ $$aInternational Relations/Trade 000313601 650__ $$aMarketing 000313601 650__ $$aResearch Methods/Statistical Methods 000313601 700__ $$aHutchinson, T. Q 000313601 8560_ $$fwkolson@comcast.net 000313601 8564_ $$9f4018ac2-e160-4843-96e7-ec4e804f23ab$$s2754807$$uhttps://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/313601/files/mrr812.pdf 000313601 909CO $$ooai:ageconsearch.umn.edu:313601$$pGLOBAL_SET 000313601 913__ $$aBy depositing this Content ('Content') in AgEcon Search, I agree that I am solely responsible for any consequences of uploading this Content to AgEcon Search and making it publicly available, and I represent and warrant that: I am either the sole creator and the owner of the copyrights and all other rights in the Content; or, without obtaining another’s permission, I have the right to deposit the Content in an archive such as AgEcon Search. To the extent that any portions of the Content are not my own creation, they are used with the copyright holder’s express permission or as permitted by law. Additionally, the Content does not infringe the copyrights or other intellectual property rights of another, nor does the Content violate any laws or another’s rights of privacy or publicity. The Content contains no restricted, private, confidential, or otherwise protected data or information that should not be publicly shared. I understand that AgEcon Search will do its best to provide perpetual access to my Content. In order to support these efforts, I grant the Regents of the University of Minnesota ('University'), through AgEcon Search, the following non-exclusive, irrevocable, royalty-free, world-wide rights and licenses: to access, reproduce, distribute and publicly display the Content, in whole or in part, in order to secure, preserve and make it publicly available, and to make derivative works based upon the Content in order to migrate the Content to other media or formats, or to preserve its public access. These terms do not transfer ownership of the copyright(s) in the Content. These terms only grant to the University the limited license outlined above. 000313601 980__ $$a2393