@article{Ogg:308077,
      recid = {308077},
      author = {Ogg, Clayton W. and Aillery, Marcel P. and Ribaudo, Marc  O.},
      title = {Implementing the Conservation Reserve Program:  Analysis  of Environmental Options},
      address = {1989-10},
      number = {1473-2020-1570},
      series = {Agricultural Economic Report No. 618},
      pages = {33},
      year = {1989},
      abstract = {Benefits would be mixed if the Conservation Reserve  Program  (CRP) were expanded to include irrigated land,  highly erodible  land, and cropped wetlands, which  contribute to environmental  problems.  This report  examines the following options for  implementing  environmental provisions of the CRP: -- Irrigated land.  Enrollment costs for this acreage are high since irrigation  is profitable in many areas. Net environmental benefits  would not likely increase. -- Erodible land in watersheds  with pollution problems. Water quality could benefit  considerably by targeting selected watersheds. Targeting  modest acreages of buffer strips near streams would  increase benefits even more. -- Cropped wetlands. Wildlife  habitat would improve by restoring up to 6 million acres to  wetlands.},
      url = {http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/308077},
      doi = {https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.308077},
}