000268478 001__ 268478
000268478 005__ 20180402190852.0
000268478 022__ $$a1496-5208
000268478 037__ $$a1753-2018-1379
000268478 041__ $$aeng
000268478 245__ $$aDefining the Contours of the Public Morals Exception under Article XX of the GATT 1994
000268478 260__ $$c2017-12-31
000268478 269__ $$a2017-12-31
000268478 336__ $$aJournal Article
000268478 520__ $$aThough the liberalisation of trade in goods is the central objective of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994 (GATT 1994), Article XX makes provisions on general exceptions to the legally binding trade liberalisation obligations. Of the ten paragraphs contained under Article XX that provide for various exceptions, the first paragraph – Article XX(a) – allows for derogation from the obligations under the GATT 1994 if the justification for this is based on a necessary protection of public morals. There are very few cases on the public morals exception. The U.S. – Gambling case was the first decided case where the public morals exception was the subject matter. However, this case was decided under the services regime in WTO law – i.e., the General Agreement on Trade in Services. The China – Publications and Audiovisual Products case offered the opportunity for aWTO dispute settlement panel and the Appellate Body to provide clarity on the public morals exception as it relates to trade in goods. This article explores the contours of the public morals exception under Article XX(a) of the GATT 1994 by engaging in analyses of the two decided cases where the issue of public morals was a key subject matter in the dispute. It also borrows from the jurisprudence on other exceptions under Article XX in a bid to map out the contours of the public morals exception.
000268478 542__ $$fBy depositing this Content ('Content') in AgEcon Search, I agree that  I am solely responsible for any consequences of uploading this Content to AgEcon Search and making it publicly available, and I represent and warrant that: I am either the sole creator and the owner of the copyrights and all other rights in the Content; or, without obtaining another’s permission, I have the right to deposit the Content in an archive such as AgEcon Search. To the extent that any portions of the Content are not my own creation, they are used with the copyright holder’s express permission or as permitted by law. Additionally, the Content does not infringe the copyrights or other intellectual property rights of another, nor does the Content violate any laws or another’s rights of privacy or publicity. The Content contains no restricted, private, confidential, or otherwise protected data or information that should not be publicly shared. I understand that AgEcon Search will do its best to provide perpetual access to my Content. In order to support these efforts, I grant the Regents of the University of Minnesota ('University'), through AgEcon Search, the following non-exclusive, irrevocable, royalty-free, world-wide rights and licenses: to access, reproduce, distribute and publicly display the Content, in whole or in part, in order to secure, preserve and make it publicly available, and to make derivative works based upon the Content in order to migrate the Content to other media or formats, or to preserve its public access. These terms do not transfer ownership of the copyright(s) in the Content. These terms only grant to the University the limited license outlined above.
000268478 546__ $$aEnglish
000268478 6531_ $$aextra-territorial jurisdiction
000268478 6531_ $$apublic morals
000268478 6531_ $$atrade liberalisation
000268478 700__ $$aAlModarra, B.B.M.
000268478 773__ $$jVolume 18$$kNumber 2$$o157$$q142$$tEstey Journal of International Law and Trade Policy
000268478 8560_ $$fwilliam.kerr@usask.ca
000268478 8564_ $$s190675$$uhttps://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/268478/files/AlModarra18-2lay.pdf
000268478 8564_ $$s1591206$$uhttps://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/268478/files/AlModarra18-2lay.pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa
000268478 909CO $$ooai:ageconsearch.umn.edu:268478$$pGLOBAL_SET
000268478 980__ $$a1753