Files
Abstract
The mismanagement of water resources at global level calls for a reconsideration of the current
water policies. The three approaches to water policy instruments are water pricing,
water markets, and institutional instruments based on cooperation. The approach in Spain
is institutional cooperation, whereas the European Union promotes water pricing to balance
water supply and demand, and in Australia water markets have been implemented to confront
water scarcity and droughts. This study compares these three types of policy instruments
to address drought in the Jucar Basin. The analysis indicates that the institutional
instrument based on cooperation and the water market instrument both achieve similar results,
demonstrating that the current institutional approach is not inferior to water markets.
Another important result is that the water pricing instrument entails very substantial losses
to farmers, which implies that this alternative is politically unfeasible. This result questions
seriously the reliance of the Water Framework Directive on the water pricing instrument in
irrigation.