@article{Caracciolo:244704,
      recid = {244704},
      author = {Caracciolo, Francesco and D’Amico, Mario and Di Vita,  Giuseppe and Pomarici, Eugenio and Dal Bianco, Andrea and  Cembalo, Luigi},
      title = {Private vs. Collective Wine Reputation},
      journal = {International Food and Agribusiness Management Review},
      address = {2016-08-15},
      number = {1030-2016-83139},
      series = {Volume 19},
      pages = {20},
      month = {Aug},
      year = {2016},
      note = {The IFAMR is published quarterly my IFAMA. For more  information visit: www.ifama.org.},
      abstract = {Using a hedonic pricing model, this paper investigates the  pricing implications of two broadly defined wine reputation  strategies: private and collective. While the former  consists of an individual quality differentiation strategy  relying on an individual wine producer's own reputation,  the latter mainly relies on the reputation of a group of  wineries belonging to a particular geographic denomination.  To this aim, wine purchases made by a nationally  representative panel of Italian households were analyzed.  Estimates based on quantile regression reveal that the  effects of the two reputation strategies (private and  collective) have a different weight according to the price  segment of the wines in question. While private reputation  plays a major role in both low and high priced wines,  collective reputation in terms of geographical designations  seems especially important for high priced wines.},
      url = {http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/244704},
      doi = {https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.244704},
}