Files
Abstract
Infrastructure public-private partnerships (“P3s”) have gained considerable recognition as useful
policy tools for state and local governments to deliver critically needed infrastructure projects.
The objective of this study is to empirically test one of the claims often made regarding states’
motivations for employing this procurement mechanism: P3s can help overcome fiscal constraints
on state infrastructure investment. In addition, this study empirically analyzes how state P3 enabling
legislation affects the behavior of both the public and private sectors. A regular logit model and a
fixed effects logit panel model are employed to test the hypothesis that states with more severe fiscal
constraints are more likely to seek P3s for highway infrastructure construction and finance. After
controlling for such factors as state economic condition, legislative political affiliation, and highway
travel demand, the empirical results indicate that states’ fiscal constraints are not associated with
the propensity to use highway P3 projects.