000201680 001__ 201680
000201680 005__ 20210122074715.0
000201680 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.22004/ag.econ.201680
000201680 037__ $$a905-2016-70391
000201680 037__ $$a905-2016-70990
000201680 041__ $$aeng
000201680 245__ $$aQuality labels and rural development : a new economic geography approach
000201680 260__ $$c2006
000201680 269__ $$a2006
000201680 336__ $$aJournal Article
000201680 490__ $$a78
000201680 520__ $$aSome rural development strategies are based on the assumption that quality labels may act as levers for inducing economic growth and population migration to rural areas. To investigate the validity of this assumption, we use a new economic geography model. A specific (“labelled”) agricultural good is assumed to be produced by farmers who co-operate in order to set a monopoly price and control the number of producers. We find that there is a trade-off between the number of differentiated farmers and their individual income. Besides, the positive effect of agricultural differentiation on rural industrialization, due to increased demand for industrial goods, is offset by an opposite effect due to urban wages rise. Higher transport costs for the specific good favour rural industrialization but limit the size of the differentiated agricultural sector.
000201680 650__ $$aCommunity/Rural/Urban Development
000201680 6531_ $$arural development
000201680 6531_ $$adesignation of origin
000201680 6531_ $$anew economic geography
000201680 700__ $$aCallois, Jean-Marc
000201680 773__ $$q31$$o51$$tCahiers d'Economie et de Sociologie Rurales (CESR)$$j78$$d2006
000201680 8564_ $$91751bdf6-d82c-4d77-974d-7f1507563d67$$s525490$$uhttps://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/201680/files/78-31-51.pdf
000201680 887__ $$ahttp://purl.umn.edu/201680
000201680 909CO $$ooai:ageconsearch.umn.edu:201680$$pGLOBAL_SET
000201680 912__ $$nSubmitted by Laure Latruffe (raestud@rennes.inra.fr) on 2015-04-15T12:47:58Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
78-31-51.pdf: 525490 bytes, checksum: 86b96f43f1dfe8754995e5f7ebe1fc29 (MD5)
000201680 912__ $$nMade available in DSpace on 2015-04-15T12:47:59Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
78-31-51.pdf: 525490 bytes, checksum: 86b96f43f1dfe8754995e5f7ebe1fc29 (MD5)
  Previous issue date: 2006
000201680 913__ $$aLicense granted by Laure Latruffe (raestud@rennes.inra.fr) on 2015-04-15T12:45:21Z (GMT):

<center>  <h2> Deposit Agreement </h2> </center>
I represent that I am the creator of the digital material identified herein (“Work”).
I represent that the work is original and that I either own all rights of copyright 
or have the right to deposit the copy in a digital archive such as AgEcon Search. 
I represent that in regard to any non-original material included in the Work I have
secured written permission of the copyright owner (s) for this use or believe this 
use is allowed by law. I further represent that I have included all appropriate 
credits and attributions. I hereby grant the Regents of the University of Minnesota
(“University”), through AgEcon Search, a non-exclusive right to access, reproduce, 
and distribute the Work, in whole or in part, for the purposes of security, preservation,
and perpetual access. I grant the University a limited, non-exclusive right to make
derivative works for the purpose of migrating the Work to other media or formats in
order to preserve access to the Work. I do not transfer or intend to transfer any 
right of copyright or other intellectual property to the University. If the Deposit 
Agreement is executed by the Author�s Representative, the Representative shall separately
execute the following representation: I represent that I am authorized by the Author
to execute this Deposit Agreement on behalf of the Author.

000201680 980__ $$a905
000201680 982__ $$gCahiers d'Economie et de Sociologie Rurales (CESR)>Volume 78, 2006