@article{Pannell:200176,
      recid = {200176},
      author = {Pannell, David J.},
      title = {Reviewing journal papers effectively, efficiently and  fairly},
      address = {2015-03-22},
      number = {1784-2016-141912},
      series = {Working Paper},
      pages = {13},
      month = {Mar},
      year = {2015},
      note = {Paper presented at the 59th Conference of the Australian  Agricultural and Resource Economics Society (AARES),  Rotorua, 10-13 February 2015},
      abstract = {Academic journals rely on researchers agreeing to act as  reviewers (or referees) for submitted papers. Researchers  who publish papers themselves benefit from the  contributions of those who review their papers, and so have  a moral obligation to provide reviewing services for  journals. However, reviewing is time consuming, and the  total number of papers published continues to increase, so  editors have found it increasingly difficult to obtain  reviews. Further, the quality of reviews provided by  reviewers varies greatly. This paper addresses various  issues related to the journal refereeing process,  including: tips on how to go about conducting a  high-quality review efficiently and fairly; what can and  cannot realistically be expected of referees; advice on  dealing with ethical issues in refereeing; problems with  the existing peer-review system used most commonly by  journals; and a look at novel review systems.},
      url = {http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/200176},
      doi = {https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.200176},
}