000164593 001__ 164593
000164593 005__ 20210122073746.0
000164593 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.22004/ag.econ.164593
000164593 037__ $$a1203-2016-95543
000164593 037__ $$a1203-2016-96425
000164593 041__ $$aeng
000164593 245__ $$aThe Impact of Four Alternative Policies to Decrease Soda Consumption
000164593 260__ $$c2014
000164593 269__ $$a2014
000164593 270__ $$myizao.liu@uconn.edu$$pLiu,   Yizao
000164593 300__ $$a16
000164593 336__ $$aJournal Article
000164593 520__ $$aWe examine the impact of four policy options on consumption of carbonated soft drinks (CSDs) by estimating a random-coefficient discrete-choice model of demand. Policy simulations using demand estimates indicate that the impacts of banning television advertising, limiting container size, and limiting calories on total consumption would be similar—an estimated 15.40–15.75 percent reduction. However, limiting calories would have a significantly greater impact on consumption of regular CSDs (–28.89 percent) and on calories consumed from CSDs (–19.34 percent). A tax on calories was least effective in curtailing overall consumption and consumption of regular CSDs.
000164593 650__ $$aAgricultural and Food Policy
000164593 650__ $$aConsumer/Household Economics
000164593 650__ $$aFood Consumption/Nutrition/Food Safety
000164593 650__ $$aHealth Economics and Policy
000164593 6531_ $$aadvertising
000164593 6531_ $$acarbonated soft drinks
000164593 6531_ $$aconsumer behavior
000164593 6531_ $$ademand
000164593 6531_ $$aobesity
000164593 6531_ $$apolicy
000164593 6531_ $$asodas
000164593 6531_ $$ataxes
000164593 700__ $$aLiu, Yizao
000164593 700__ $$aLopez, Rigoberto A.
000164593 700__ $$aZhu, Chen
000164593 773__ $$tAgricultural and Resource Economics Review
000164593 773__ $$jPrepublication Previews
000164593 8564_ $$947bfab37-ea75-4480-b1c9-b1abedd0f6f6$$s272374$$uhttps://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/164593/files/ARER%202014%2004%20Liu%20AgEcon%20Prepub.pdf
000164593 887__ $$ahttp://purl.umn.edu/164593
000164593 909CO $$ooai:ageconsearch.umn.edu:164593$$pGLOBAL_SET
000164593 912__ $$nSubmitted by Natalie Karst (nataliek@randomfierce.com) on 2014-03-04T03:34:35Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
ARER 2014 04 Liu AgEcon Prepub.pdf: 272374 bytes, checksum: 3a82620657d6a25d61198657484cda41 (MD5)
000164593 912__ $$nMade available in DSpace on 2014-03-04T03:34:35Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ARER 2014 04 Liu AgEcon Prepub.pdf: 272374 bytes, checksum: 3a82620657d6a25d61198657484cda41 (MD5)
  Previous issue date: 2014
000164593 913__ $$aLicense granted by Natalie Karst (nataliek@randomfierce.com) on 2014-03-04T03:29:50Z (GMT):

<center>  <h2> Deposit Agreement </h2> </center>
I represent that I am the creator of the digital material identified herein (“Work”).
I represent that the work is original and that I either own all rights of copyright 
or have the right to deposit the copy in a digital archive such as AgEcon Search. 
I represent that in regard to any non-original material included in the Work I have
secured written permission of the copyright owner (s) for this use or believe this 
use is allowed by law. I further represent that I have included all appropriate 
credits and attributions. I hereby grant the Regents of the University of Minnesota
(“University”), through AgEcon Search, a non-exclusive right to access, reproduce, 
and distribute the Work, in whole or in part, for the purposes of security, preservation,
and perpetual access. I grant the University a limited, non-exclusive right to make
derivative works for the purpose of migrating the Work to other media or formats in
order to preserve access to the Work. I do not transfer or intend to transfer any 
right of copyright or other intellectual property to the University. If the Deposit 
Agreement is executed by the Author�s Representative, the Representative shall separately
execute the following representation: I represent that I am authorized by the Author
to execute this Deposit Agreement on behalf of the Author.

000164593 980__ $$a1203
000164593 982__ $$gAgricultural and Resource Economics Review>Volume: Prepublication Reviews