000156939 001__ 156939
000156939 005__ 20210122073340.0
000156939 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.22004/ag.econ.156939
000156939 037__ $$a1346-2016-104920
000156939 037__ $$a1346-2016-105858
000156939 041__ $$aeng
000156939 084__ $$aR52
000156939 084__ $$aQ24
000156939 245__ $$aThe economic and environmental impact of trade   in forest reserve obligations: a simulation analysis of  options for dealing with habitat heterogeneity
000156939 260__ $$c2005-12-30
000156939 269__ $$a2005-12-30
000156939 270__ $$mkchomitz@worldbank.org$$pChomitz,   Kenneth M.
000156939 300__ $$a28
000156939 336__ $$aJournal Article
000156939 490__ $$aVolume 43
000156939 490__ $$aNumber 4
000156939 520__ $$aA tradeable development rights (TDR) program focusing on 
biodiversity conservation faces a crucial problem: defining which areas 
of habitat should be considered equivalent. Restricting the trading scope 
to a narrow area could boost the range of biodiversity conserved but 
could increase the opportunity cost of conservation.
The issue is relevant to Brazil, where TDR-like policies are emerging. 
Long-standing laws require each rural property to maintain a legal forest 
reserve (reserva legal) of at least 20%, but emerging policies allow some 
tradeability of this obligation. This paper uses a simple, spatially explicit 
model to simulate a hypothetical state-level program. We find that wider 
trading scopes drastically reduce landholder costs of complying with this 
regulation and result in environmentally preferable landscapes.....Programas que tenham por objetivo desenvolver um mercado
de Direitos Especiais de Propriedade (DEP) enfrentam um problema fundamental,
qual seja a definição de áreas de preservação equivalentes.
Caso a definição seja por um conceito muito restritivo, poderá ocorrer
uma maior conservação da biodiversidade, porém com um aumento do
custo de oportunidade da preservação ambiental.
O assunto é relevante para o Brasil onde programas semelhantes aos DEP
estão surgindo. A legislação exige que cada propriedade rural mantenha
pelo menos 20% de sua área na forma de florestas (reserva legal), porém
algumas políticas nascentes já permitem tipo de negociação de Direitos.
Este trabalho usa um modelo espacial simples para simular o efeito de um
programa hipotético implantado em um estado. O principal resultado é
que uma política menos restritiva para a comercialização dos DEP reduz
de forma expressiva, para os produtores rurais, os custos de cumprir a
legislação e leva a soluções preferíveis sob o ponto de vista ambiental.
000156939 650__ $$aAgribusiness
000156939 6531_ $$aBrazil
000156939 6531_ $$aconservation
000156939 6531_ $$aenvironment
000156939 6531_ $$aland use
000156939 6531_ $$aMinas Gerais
000156939 6531_ $$atradeable development rights
000156939 6531_ $$aconservação
000156939 6531_ $$ameio ambiente
000156939 6531_ $$auso da terra
000156939 6531_ $$acomercialização de direritos especiais de propriedade
000156939 700__ $$aChomitz, Kenneth M.
000156939 700__ $$aThomas, Timothy S.
000156939 700__ $$aBrandão, Antônio Salazar P.
000156939 773__ $$q657$$o684$$tBrazilian Journal of Rural Economy and Sociology (Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural-RESR)$$j43$$k4$$dDecember 2005
000156939 8564_ $$924afff57-befb-4c3b-a9a1-cdfa9c2e2212$$s2174770$$uhttps://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/156939/files/27750.pdf
000156939 887__ $$ahttp://purl.umn.edu/156939
000156939 909CO $$ooai:ageconsearch.umn.edu:156939$$pGLOBAL_SET
000156939 912__ $$nSubmitted by Alessandra da Paz (apaz@usp.br) on 2013-09-17T11:58:11Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
27750.pdf: 2174770 bytes, checksum: 48d599129e0b645c005739c81555c7a5 (MD5)
000156939 912__ $$nMade available in DSpace on 2013-09-17T11:58:11Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
27750.pdf: 2174770 bytes, checksum: 48d599129e0b645c005739c81555c7a5 (MD5)
  Previous issue date: 2005-12-30
000156939 913__ $$aLicense granted by Alessandra da Paz (apaz@usp.br) on 2013-09-17T11:55:32Z (GMT):

<center>  <h2> Deposit Agreement </h2> </center>
I represent that I am the creator of the digital material identified herein (“Work”).
I represent that the work is original and that I either own all rights of copyright 
or have the right to deposit the copy in a digital archive such as AgEcon Search. 
I represent that in regard to any non-original material included in the Work I have
secured written permission of the copyright owner (s) for this use or believe this 
use is allowed by law. I further represent that I have included all appropriate 
credits and attributions. I hereby grant the Regents of the University of Minnesota
(“University”), through AgEcon Search, a non-exclusive right to access, reproduce, 
and distribute the Work, in whole or in part, for the purposes of security, preservation,
and perpetual access. I grant the University a limited, non-exclusive right to make
derivative works for the purpose of migrating the Work to other media or formats in
order to preserve access to the Work. I do not transfer or intend to transfer any 
right of copyright or other intellectual property to the University. If the Deposit 
Agreement is executed by the Author�s Representative, the Representative shall separately
execute the following representation: I represent that I am authorized by the Author
to execute this Deposit Agreement on behalf of the Author.

000156939 980__ $$a1346
000156939 982__ $$gBrazilian Journal of Rural Economy and Sociology (RESR)>Volume 43, Number 4, December 2005