000151301 001__ 151301
000151301 005__ 20210122073219.0
000151301 0247_ $$aISSN : 1778-4379$$2Other
000151301 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.22004/ag.econ.151301
000151301 037__ $$a910-2016-71830
000151301 037__ $$a910-2016-71946
000151301 041__ $$aeng
000151301 245__ $$aReasons for the (in)effectiveness of consumer boycotts: Economic analysis approach
000151301 260__ $$c2011-05
000151301 269__ $$a2011-05
000151301 270__ $$mpdelacote@nancy-engref.inra.fr$$pDelacote,   Philippe
000151301 300__ $$a4
000151301 336__ $$aJournal Article
000151301 490__ $$aISS
000151301 490__ $$a6/2010
000151301 520__ $$aThe frequent use of consumer boycotts by certain environmental protection and civil society protagonists makes one wonder about the true potential effectiveness of this tool. By cross-checking the elements of behavioural economic analysis and game theory, we propose to differentiate between the main sources of ineffectiveness of such actions and, in particular, the weakness of coordination between participants, the potentially massive presence of free-riders, the characteristics of markets and alternative technologies, and so on. These studies will help towards the identification of areas for reflection on the relative effectiveness of the socially aware consumption. We illustrate the subject with the example of tropical timber logging.
000151301 650__ $$aEnvironmental Economics and Policy
000151301 650__ $$aIndustrial Organization
000151301 700__ $$aDelacote, Philippe
000151301 773__ $$tINRA Sciences Sociales$$d2010$$j2010
000151301 8564_ $$99e9bc730-4229-4fd3-8157-b241179dbdfb$$s105664$$uhttps://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/151301/files/iss10-6_eng.pdf
000151301 887__ $$ahttp://purl.umn.edu/151301
000151301 909CO $$ooai:ageconsearch.umn.edu:151301$$pGLOBAL_SET
000151301 912__ $$nSubmitted by Sophie Drogue (drogue@supagro.inra.fr) on 2013-06-17T09:11:51Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
iss10-6_eng.pdf: 105664 bytes, checksum: 3db9a788bd0d87b5b9920f48084b25f6 (MD5)
000151301 912__ $$nMade available in DSpace on 2013-06-17T09:11:53Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
iss10-6_eng.pdf: 105664 bytes, checksum: 3db9a788bd0d87b5b9920f48084b25f6 (MD5)
  Previous issue date: 2011-05
000151301 913__ $$aLicense granted by Sophie Drogue (drogue@supagro.inra.fr) on 2013-06-17T09:07:41Z (GMT):

<center>  <h2> Deposit Agreement </h2> </center>
I represent that I am the creator of the digital material identified herein (“Work”).
I represent that the work is original and that I either own all rights of copyright 
or have the right to deposit the copy in a digital archive such as AgEcon Search. 
I represent that in regard to any non-original material included in the Work I have
secured written permission of the copyright owner (s) for this use or believe this 
use is allowed by law. I further represent that I have included all appropriate 
credits and attributions. I hereby grant the Regents of the University of Minnesota
(“University”), through AgEcon Search, a non-exclusive right to access, reproduce, 
and distribute the Work, in whole or in part, for the purposes of security, preservation,
and perpetual access. I grant the University a limited, non-exclusive right to make
derivative works for the purpose of migrating the Work to other media or formats in
order to preserve access to the Work. I do not transfer or intend to transfer any 
right of copyright or other intellectual property to the University. If the Deposit 
Agreement is executed by the Author�s Representative, the Representative shall separately
execute the following representation: I represent that I am authorized by the Author
to execute this Deposit Agreement on behalf of the Author.

000151301 980__ $$a910
000151301 982__ $$gINRA Sciences Sociales>2010