000134496 001__ 134496
000134496 005__ 20210122072611.0
000134496 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.22004/ag.econ.134496
000134496 037__ $$a634-2016-41463
000134496 041__ $$aeng
000134496 245__ $$aAnalysis of Small-Scale Dairy Farmers' Perceptions of Alternative Fodder Grasses Contingent on Napier Stunt Disease in Bungoma District, Kenya
000134496 260__ $$c2010-10
000134496 269__ $$a2010-10
000134496 300__ $$a83
000134496 336__ $$aThesis/ Dissertation
000134496 520__ $$aSmallholder dairy sector in Western Kenya plays an important role in the livelihoods of many farm households by generating income and employment. Napier grass is the principal source of livestock feed in the region; as well as being an integral grass in the push-pull technology (PPT). Despite this fact, Napier stunt disease (NSD) has become a serious threat to the growth of Napier grass and consequently to the livestock industry. This thesis focused on farmers‟ perceptions on alternative fodder grasses to Napier grass and sought to provide a better understanding of the alternative grasses available for adoption due to the threat to fodder availability by NSD. The objective of this study was thus to determine the extent of Napier stunt disease infestation in small-scale dairy farming and to find out alternative fodder grasses small scale dairy farmers would prefer if Napier grass is affected by NSD. The study was conducted in Bungoma District (now county), Western province, Kenya. Primary data were collected from 140 small-scale dairy farmers. Descriptive statistics and multinomial logit model were employed to generate the results using STATA and SPSS application software. Results revealed that, Napier grass is the main source of fodder by the majority (98.6%) of the farmers and that the cultivation and expansion of the fodder crop has been severely threatened by NSD. Most (97.9%) of the interviewed farmers recognized and experienced the damage caused by this disease. At least a portion of each respondent‟s land had been affected ranging from 0.01 acres to 2.0 acres. The reported effects of NSD on dairy enterprise included: reduction in milk production, reduction of breeding stock and increased costs of production. Results further confirmed that, a majority (68.6%) of the respondents showed willingness to replace Napier grass with alternative fodder grasses. The alternatives in order of priority included: Natural grass; signal grass; Giant seteria; Sudan grass; and Molasses grass. Results obtained from multinomial logit model revealed that, some of the farm and farmer characteristics, institutional characteristics, and grass attributes were important determinants of farmers‟ perceptions on alternative grasses used in smallholder dairy farming. Consequently, it is essential that when screening alternative fodder grasses, emphasis should be placed on attributes that conform to farmers‟ preferences and that farmers should be involved in evaluation of fodder grasses to find their suitability to the farmers‟ circumstances. It is also recommended that on farm trials/ demonstrations to test grass attributes suggested as important in decision making on preference of alternative grasses should be validated.
000134496 650__ $$aCrop Production/Industries
000134496 700__ $$aTaruss, Ruth Chepchirchir
000134496 8564_ $$9806bdbef-32b2-46f1-86a3-bc8e35737c3d$$s987546$$uhttps://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/134496/files/Ruth%20Tarus%20Thesis.pdf
000134496 887__ $$ahttp://purl.umn.edu/134496
000134496 909CO $$ooai:ageconsearch.umn.edu:134496$$pGLOBAL_SET
000134496 912__ $$nSubmitted by Kirsten  Pagel (pagel076@umn.edu) on 2012-09-25T17:56:07Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
Ruth Tarus Thesis.pdf: 987546 bytes, checksum: 138435465975ccbe6e13b3a2c2ab15dd (MD5)
000134496 912__ $$nMade available in DSpace on 2012-09-25T17:56:09Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
Ruth Tarus Thesis.pdf: 987546 bytes, checksum: 138435465975ccbe6e13b3a2c2ab15dd (MD5)
  Previous issue date: 2010-10
000134496 913__ $$aLicense granted by Kirsten  Pagel (pagel076@umn.edu) on 2012-09-25T17:53:04Z (GMT):

&lt;center&gt;  &lt;h2&gt; Deposit Agreement &lt;/h2&gt; &lt;/center&gt;
I represent that I am the creator of the digital material identified herein (&amp;ldquo;Work&amp;rdquo;).
I represent that the work is original and that I either own all rights of copyright 
or have the right to deposit the copy in a digital archive such as AgEcon Search. 
I represent that in regard to any non-original material included in the Work I have
secured written permission of the copyright owner (s) for this use or believe this 
use is allowed by law. I further represent that I have included all appropriate 
credits and attributions. I hereby grant the Regents of the University of Minnesota
(&amp;ldquo;University&amp;rdquo;), through AgEcon Search, a non-exclusive right to access, reproduce, 
and distribute the Work, in whole or in part, for the purposes of security, preservation,
and perpetual access. I grant the University a limited, non-exclusive right to make
derivative works for the purpose of migrating the Work to other media or formats in
order to preserve access to the Work. I do not transfer or intend to transfer any 
right of copyright or other intellectual property to the University. If the Deposit 
Agreement is executed by the Author�s Representative, the Representative shall separately
execute the following representation: I represent that I am authorized by the Author
to execute this Deposit Agreement on behalf of the Author.

000134496 980__ $$a634
000134496 982__ $$gCollaborative Masters Program in Agricultural and Applied Economics&gt;Research Theses