@article{Kim:134287,
      recid = {134287},
      author = {Kim, GwanSeon and Petrolia, Daniel R. and Interis, Matthew  G.},
      title = {A Method for Improving Welfare Estimates from  Multiple-Referendum Surveys},
      journal = {Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics},
      address = {2012-08},
      number = {1835-2016-149441},
      series = {Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics},
      pages = {12},
      year = {2012},
      abstract = {This paper introduces an alternative non-market value  elicitation method—the  “quasi-doublereferendum”
(QDR)—applied to barrier island  restoration in Mississippi. It is appropriate for
surveys  that elicit willingness-to-pay responses to multiple  projects differing in scale only and can
be used to  increase efficiency while mitigating bias. We compare  results to the more commonly
used single-referendum (SR)  method under two admissible ranges of willingness to pay:  negative
to positive infinity, and zero to income. The  confidence intervals of the QDR models were
narrower. We  argue that the QDR approach should be less subject to bias  than the commonly
used double-referendum approach.},
      url = {http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/134287},
      doi = {https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.134287},
}