Abstract
Recently, the stakeholders in the financial industry picked up the idea used in the food
sector to label products with traffic-lights. Traffic-lights are not undisputable in either sector. The
goal of this paper is to analyze consumer thoughts about this labeling type. Moreover, using the
results of a split sample choice experiment the impact of traffic-light labeling on food and
financial product purchases is evaluated. It shows that while consumers believe that traffic-lights
are helpful in evaluating the risks and benefits associated with (food and financial) products,
support for traffic-lights is higher in the food sample. On financial products, consumers’ associate
simplicity with traffic-lights, but doubt that they increase the credibility of products. Results of a
mixed-logit estimation indicate that traffic-lights affect consumers’ purchases of both product
groups. The low-fat attribute has no significant impact on food choices without traffic-lights, but
has a positive impact on choices once signalled with a traffic-light label. Consumer evaluate
products carrying an organic product label positively, but if the product is additionally labeled
with a traffic-light, evaluation becomes negative hinting towards a substitution effect between the
organic and the TL label. Considering financial products, traffic-lights lead to a halo-effect for
the variance of returns. When no traffic-lights are on the product, consumer chose a product with
a high variance of returns less often but more often if the product is labelled with a traffic-light.