000011761 001__ 11761
000011761 005__ 20210803100818.0
000011761 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.22004/ag.econ.11761
000011761 037__ $$a1099-2016-89157
000011761 041__ $$aeng
000011761 245__ $$aISSUES AND ALTERNATIVES IN THE 1995 FARM BILL DEBATE: AN OVERVIEW OF THE FARM BILL
000011761 260__ $$c1994
000011761 269__ $$a1994
000011761 270__ $$mbatie@pilot.msu.edu$$pBatie,   Sandra S.
000011761 270__ $$mschweikh@pilot.msu.edu$$pSchweikhardt,   David B.
000011761 300__ $$a3
000011761 336__ $$aWorking or Discussion Paper
000011761 490__ $$aStaff Paper 94-50
000011761 520__ $$aNearly every aspect of Michigan Agriculture is affected by the farm bill. Farm program payments are a major source of income (25 percent of Michigan's net farm income in recent years has come from farm program payments - Figure 1), conservation compliance requirements are beginning to
affect production decisions, and export programs affect market prices. All farmers in Michigan will be affected by the decisions made in 1995, regardless of whether they currently participate in farm programs or produce program crops.
000011761 546__ $$aEnglish
000011761 650__ $$aAgricultural and Food Policy
000011761 700__ $$aBatie, Sandra S.
000011761 700__ $$aSchweikhardt, David B.
000011761 8564_ $$937fa4f39-aa2e-493c-ad89-c082512be669$$s86055$$uhttps://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/11761/files/sp94-50.pdf
000011761 887__ $$ahttp://purl.umn.edu/11761
000011761 909CO $$ooai:ageconsearch.umn.edu:11761$$pGLOBAL_SET
000011761 912__ $$nMade available in DSpace on 2007-03-08T03:44:37Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
sp94-50.pdf: 88743 bytes, checksum: 65fa4fa2b508227febf8c53ac74b975f (MD5)
  Previous issue date: 1994
000011761 980__ $$a1099
000011761 982__ $$gMichigan State University>Department of Agricultural Economics>Staff Paper Series