Elsevier

Agricultural Economics

Volume 31, Issues 2–3, December 2004, Pages 327-334
Agricultural Economics

Measuring market integration in the presence of transaction costs—a threshold vector error correction approach

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agecon.2004.09.017Get rights and content

Abstract

Applied econometric analyses of market integration based on price data alone have been criticised because they neglect the role of transaction costs. To meet this objection, threshold vector error correction models are used. Threshold models can account for the effects of transaction costs in price transmission without directly relying upon information about these costs, which are often unavailable. It is argued that threshold models that are based on two thresholds provide results that are economically more intuitive than those obtained from one-threshold models. However, to this point no adequate econometric test is available for threshold significance in a two-threshold model; such tests are only available for the one-threshold model. In this paper a restricted two-threshold model is developed in which the significance of the thresholds can be tested. This model is therefore amenable to economic interpretation and statistical inference. The model is used to estimate market integration in the European pig market.

Introduction

Econometric analyses of market integration are becoming increasingly popular. Farmers as well as agricultural economists are interested in the extent to which price shocks are transmitted between markets. For example, some German pig producers use the commodity exchange AEX in Amsterdam to hedge price risk, assuming that German and Dutch markets are highly integrated. Economists often use market integration, defined as the degree of price transmission between either vertically or spatially related markets, as a proxy for market efficiency. Adequate empirical methods are necessary to answer questions about market integration. In recent years these methods have improved considerably. Nevertheless, as pointed out by Meyer and von Cramon-Taubadel (2002), there is still no unified approach to evaluate market integration. Recent studies that rely on price data alone have been criticised by Barrett for their neglect of transaction cost (Barrett, 2001, Barrett and Li, 2002). Due to the lack of information on transaction costs, an approach of measuring market integration based on price data alone, but also considering the effects of transaction costs is proposed. Unlike most studies that analyse price adjustment between vertical related stages of the marketing chain, this analysis focuses on spatial market integration. Hence, the analysis is related to the literature on the ‘Law of one price’ (Lo and Zivot, 2001, Obstfeld and Taylor, 1997). To quantify price adjustment, the vector error correction model (VECM) framework is used. As an extension and innovation testable threshold effects are also taken into account. To illustrate this approach market integration between pig markets in Germany and The Netherlands is analysed.
In the following section of the paper, the empirical method is described. In Section 3, the results of the empirical application to German/Dutch pork markets are presented. In Section 4, conclusions are drawn and suggestions for further research are given.

Section snippets

Threshold vector error correction model

Price series for agricultural commodities are often non-stationary. However, estimating price adjustment as the impact of a change in one price on another price should be based on appropriate methods, which allow for non-stationary variables. In market integration models, the error correction model (ECM) specification has gained popularity because of its intuitively appealing interpretation. For example, von Carmon-Taubadel (1998) analysed vertical price transmission between farm gate and

Results of an empirical application

To illustrate the described threshold model market integration in the European pig market is analysed. For this purpose pig prices in Germany and The Netherlands, both major pig markets in Europe, are chosen. The share of German pig production in total EU production was 21% in 1995, and the share of Dutch pig production was 13% (ZMP, 1999). As already indicated, no clear structure of price adjustment between both markets could be determined a priori. Therefore, the use of a VECM is reasonable.

Conclusions and suggestions for further research

Analyses of market integration based on price data alone have been criticised because they often neglect the role of transaction costs. To overcome this critique the use of threshold vector error correction models is suggested. These models can account for the effects of transaction costs in price transmission analysis without directly relying on transaction cost data. A three-regime TVECM is argued to be most suitable to fit the economic requirements for the analysis of bi-directional price

References (19)

  • B.E. Hansen et al.

    Testing for two-regime threshold cointegration in vector error correction models

    J. Econometrics

    (2002)
  • M. Obstfeld et al.

    Non-linear aspects of goods-market arbitrage and adjustment: Heckscher's commodity points revisited

    J. Jpn. Int. Econ.

    (1997)
  • A. Abdulai

    Using threshold cointegration to estimate asymmetric price transmission in the Swiss pork market

    Appl. Econ.

    (2002)
  • N.S. Balke et al.

    Threshold cointegration

    Int. Econ. Rev.

    (1997)
  • C.B. Barrett

    Measuring integration and efficiency in international agricultural markets

    Rev. Agric. Econ.

    (2001)
  • C.B. Barrett et al.

    Distinguishing between equilibrium and integration in spatial price analysis

    Am. J. Agric. Econ.

    (2002)
  • M. Ben-Kaabia et al.

    Price transmission asymmetries in the lamb sector in Spain

  • S. von Carmon-Taubadel

    Estimating asymmetric price transmission with the error correction representation: an application to the german pork market

    Europ. Rev. Agric. Econ.

    (1998)
  • W. Enders et al.

    Unit-root tests and asymmetric adjustment with an example using the term structure of interest rates

    J. Bus. Econ. Stat.

    (1998)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (63)

  • Time and place where gold acts as an inflation hedge: An application of long-run and short-run threshold model

    2011, Economic Modelling
    Citation Excerpt :

    They assume that prices are linked by a constant long-run equilibrium relationship, while allowing for threshold (or switching) effects in the short-run adjustment process towards this equilibrium. The TVECM (e.g. Goodwin and Piggott, 2001; Meyer, 2004; Serra et al., 2006; Balcombe et al., 2007) distinguishes between regimes depending on whether the deviation of prices from their long-run equilibrium, in other words the error correction term, is above or below a threshold value. However, we discover the momentum (ΔECT) that is the major factor affecting adjustment process.

  • Price transmission in agricultural markets

    2021, Annual Review of Resource Economics
  • Asymmetric price transmission: A survey

    2004, Journal of Agricultural Economics
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text