Measuring market integration in the presence of transaction costs—a threshold vector error correction approach
Introduction
Econometric analyses of market integration are becoming increasingly popular. Farmers as well as agricultural economists are interested in the extent to which price shocks are transmitted between markets. For example, some German pig producers use the commodity exchange AEX in Amsterdam to hedge price risk, assuming that German and Dutch markets are highly integrated. Economists often use market integration, defined as the degree of price transmission between either vertically or spatially related markets, as a proxy for market efficiency. Adequate empirical methods are necessary to answer questions about market integration. In recent years these methods have improved considerably. Nevertheless, as pointed out by Meyer and von Cramon-Taubadel (2002), there is still no unified approach to evaluate market integration. Recent studies that rely on price data alone have been criticised by Barrett for their neglect of transaction cost (Barrett, 2001, Barrett and Li, 2002). Due to the lack of information on transaction costs, an approach of measuring market integration based on price data alone, but also considering the effects of transaction costs is proposed. Unlike most studies that analyse price adjustment between vertical related stages of the marketing chain, this analysis focuses on spatial market integration. Hence, the analysis is related to the literature on the ‘Law of one price’ (Lo and Zivot, 2001, Obstfeld and Taylor, 1997). To quantify price adjustment, the vector error correction model (VECM) framework is used. As an extension and innovation testable threshold effects are also taken into account. To illustrate this approach market integration between pig markets in Germany and The Netherlands is analysed.
In the following section of the paper, the empirical method is described. In Section 3, the results of the empirical application to German/Dutch pork markets are presented. In Section 4, conclusions are drawn and suggestions for further research are given.
Section snippets
Threshold vector error correction model
Price series for agricultural commodities are often non-stationary. However, estimating price adjustment as the impact of a change in one price on another price should be based on appropriate methods, which allow for non-stationary variables. In market integration models, the error correction model (ECM) specification has gained popularity because of its intuitively appealing interpretation. For example, von Carmon-Taubadel (1998) analysed vertical price transmission between farm gate and
Results of an empirical application
To illustrate the described threshold model market integration in the European pig market is analysed. For this purpose pig prices in Germany and The Netherlands, both major pig markets in Europe, are chosen. The share of German pig production in total EU production was 21% in 1995, and the share of Dutch pig production was 13% (ZMP, 1999). As already indicated, no clear structure of price adjustment between both markets could be determined a priori. Therefore, the use of a VECM is reasonable.
Conclusions and suggestions for further research
Analyses of market integration based on price data alone have been criticised because they often neglect the role of transaction costs. To overcome this critique the use of threshold vector error correction models is suggested. These models can account for the effects of transaction costs in price transmission analysis without directly relying on transaction cost data. A three-regime TVECM is argued to be most suitable to fit the economic requirements for the analysis of bi-directional price
References (19)
- et al.
Testing for two-regime threshold cointegration in vector error correction models
J. Econometrics
(2002) - et al.
Non-linear aspects of goods-market arbitrage and adjustment: Heckscher's commodity points revisited
J. Jpn. Int. Econ.
(1997) Using threshold cointegration to estimate asymmetric price transmission in the Swiss pork market
Appl. Econ.
(2002)- et al.
Threshold cointegration
Int. Econ. Rev.
(1997) Measuring integration and efficiency in international agricultural markets
Rev. Agric. Econ.
(2001)- et al.
Distinguishing between equilibrium and integration in spatial price analysis
Am. J. Agric. Econ.
(2002) - et al.
Price transmission asymmetries in the lamb sector in Spain
Estimating asymmetric price transmission with the error correction representation: an application to the german pork market
Europ. Rev. Agric. Econ.
(1998)- et al.
Unit-root tests and asymmetric adjustment with an example using the term structure of interest rates
J. Bus. Econ. Stat.
(1998)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.
Cited by (63)
Time and place where gold acts as an inflation hedge: An application of long-run and short-run threshold model
2011, Economic ModellingCitation Excerpt :They assume that prices are linked by a constant long-run equilibrium relationship, while allowing for threshold (or switching) effects in the short-run adjustment process towards this equilibrium. The TVECM (e.g. Goodwin and Piggott, 2001; Meyer, 2004; Serra et al., 2006; Balcombe et al., 2007) distinguishes between regimes depending on whether the deviation of prices from their long-run equilibrium, in other words the error correction term, is above or below a threshold value. However, we discover the momentum (ΔECT) that is the major factor affecting adjustment process.
Price transmission in agricultural markets
2021, Annual Review of Resource EconomicsThe impact of market and policy instability on price transmission between wheat and flour in Ukraine
2009, European Review of Agricultural EconomicsBayesian estimation and selection of nonlinear vector error correction models: The case of the sugar-ethanol-oil nexus in Brazil
2008, American Journal of Agricultural EconomicsAsymmetric price transmission: A survey
2004, Journal of Agricultural Economics
Copyright © 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.