People versus planners: Social Preferences for Adaptation to Climate Change

Adaptation of natural and human systems to climate change is receiving increased attention. The academic literature covers a wide spectrum of perspectives. Policy considerations, on the other hand, are largely driven by techno-scientific considerations. In particular, these include a risk-management approach. Climate change, however, is inherently uncertain – because the risks cannot be quantified, conventional risk-management approaches are inappropriate. The ‘real options’ economic theory is used for least-cost adaptation strategies. Identifying individuals’ preferences and priorities is a necessary pre-condition for estimating the benefits of adaptation strategies. Yet little has been done in this area. As a first step towards estimating individuals’ willingness to pay for adaptation measures, this research paper proposes to identify and compare priorities and preferences of planners, communities and individuals.


Issue Date:
Dec 14 2009
Publication Type:
Report
DOI and Other Identifiers:
ISSN 1835-9728 (Other)
PURL Identifier:
http://purl.umn.edu/94890
Total Pages:
31
Series Statement:
Environmental Economics Research Hub Research Reports
41




 Record created 2017-04-01, last modified 2017-08-25

Fulltext:
Download fulltext
PDF

Rate this document:

Rate this document:
1
2
3
 
(Not yet reviewed)