Tecnologia cristalizada e produtividade total dos fatores

Suppose that the production, y = f (x1, x2,..., xs ) , is known. It says that we are able to know for each value of the input vector, 1 2 , ,..., s x x x , the correspondent value of y. Or yet production growth occurs as consequence of movement along the production frontier, and it requires a different combination of inputs, and consequently, a higher or a smaller expenditure. Another representation of the production structure is, 1 2 ( , ,..., , ) s y = f x x x t , where t is non negative real number. Now each set of 1 2 , ,..., s x x x gives a different y as t varies. Or, it is possible to achieve a higher level of production with no additional cost. A question comes to mind: can the real world (or the data) say which one of the two representations has a better descriptive power? The answer is no. Or yet, the real world cannot distinguish between embodied and disembodied technology in a sense that will be introduced below. We will not use directly the concept of production function to establish the model appropriate to test embodied technology against the disembodied one. In its place, the rates of growth of products and inputs are instrumental.


Variant title:
Technology crystallized and total factor productivity
Issue Date:
2004
Publication Type:
Journal Article
DOI and Other Identifiers:
ISSN 1679-1614 (Other)
PURL Identifier:
http://purl.umn.edu/56774
Published in:
Revista de Economia e Agronegócio / Brazilian Review of Economics and Agribusiness, Volume 02, Number 4
Page range:
547-560
Total Pages:
13




 Record created 2017-04-01, last modified 2017-08-25

Fulltext:
Download fulltext
PDF

Rate this document:

Rate this document:
1
2
3
 
(Not yet reviewed)