000055291 001__ 55291
000055291 005__ 20170825124524.0
000055291 037__ $$a838-2016-55702
000055291 041__ $$aen
000055291 084__ $$aQ
000055291 084__ $$aQ40
000055291 084__ $$aQ54
000055291 245__ $$aGlobal Climate Policy Architecture and Political Feasibility: Specific Formulas and Emission Targets to Attain 460 ppm CO2 Concentrations
000055291 260__ $$c2009
000055291 269__ $$a2009
000055291 270__ $$mvalentina.bosetti@feem.it$$pBosetti,   Valentina
000055291 300__ $$a53
000055291 336__ $$aWorking or Discussion Paper
000055291 490__ $$aSD
000055291 490__ $$a92.2009
000055291 520__ $$aThree gaps in the Kyoto Protocol most badly need to be filled: the absence of emission targets extending far into the future, the absence of participation by the United States, China, and other developing countries, and the absence of reason to think that members will abide by commitments.  To be politically acceptable, any new treaty that fills these gaps must, we believe, obey certain constraints regarding country-by-country economic costs.  We offer a framework of formulas that assign quantitative allocations of emissions, across countries, one budget period at a time.  The two-part plan: (i) China and other developing countries accept targets at BAU in the coming budget period, the same period in which the US first agrees to cuts below BAU; and (ii) all countries are asked in the future to make further cuts in accordance with a formula which sums up a Progressive Reductions Factor, a Latecomer Catch-up Factor, and a Gradual Equalization Factor.  An earlier proposal for specific parameter values in the formulas – Frankel (2009), as analyzed by Bosetti, et al (2009) – achieved the environmental goal that concentrations of CO2 plateau at 500 ppm by 2100.   It succeeded in obeying our political constraints, such as keeping the economic cost for every country below the thresholds of Y=1% of income in Present Discounted Value, and X=5% of income in the worst period.  In pursuit of more aggressive environmental goals, we now advance the dates at which some countries are asked to begin cutting below BAU, within our framework.  We also tinker with the values for the parameters in the formulas.   The resulting target paths for emissions are run through the WITCH model to find their economic and environmental effects. We find that it is not possible to attain a 380 ppm CO2 goal (roughly in line with the 2°C target) without violating our political constraints.  We were however, able to attain a concentration goal of 460 ppm CO2 with looser political constraints.  The most important result is that we had to raise the threshold of costs above which a country drops out, to as high as Y =3.4% of income in PDV terms, or X =12 % in the worst budget period. Some may conclude from these results that the more aggressive environmental goals are not attainable in practice, and that our earlier proposal for how to attain 500 ppm CO2 is the better plan.  We take no position on which environmental goal is best overall.  Rather, we submit that, whatever the goal, our approach will give targets that are more practical economically and politically than approaches that have been proposed by others.
000055291 542__ $$fLicense granted by Nancy Elera (nancy.elera@feem.it) on 2009-11-26T15:55:41Z (GMT):

<center>  <h2> Deposit Agreement </h2> </center>
I represent that I am the creator of the digital material identified herein (&ldquo;Work&rdquo;).
I represent that the work is original and that I either own all rights of copyright 
or have the right to deposit the copy in a digital archive such as AgEcon Search. 
I represent that in regard to any non-original material included in the Work I have
secured written permission of the copyright owner (s) for this use or believe this 
use is allowed by law. I further represent that I have included all appropriate 
credits and attributions. I hereby grant the Regents of the University of Minnesota
(&ldquo;University&rdquo;), through AgEcon Search, a non-exclusive right to access, reproduce, 
and distribute the Work, in whole or in part, for the purposes of security, preservation,
and perpetual access. I grant the University a limited, non-exclusive right to make
derivative works for the purpose of migrating the Work to other media or formats in
order to preserve access to the Work. I do not transfer or intend to transfer any 
right of copyright or other intellectual property to the University. If the Deposit 
Agreement is executed by the Author�s Representative, the Representative shall separately
execute the following representation: I represent that I am authorized by the Author
to execute this Deposit Agreement on behalf of the Author.

000055291 650__ $$aEnvironmental Economics and Policy
000055291 6531_ $$aInternational Climate Agreements
000055291 700__ $$aBosetti, Valentina
000055291 700__ $$aFrankel, Jeffrey
000055291 8564_ $$s582547$$uhttp://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/55291/files/92-09.pdf
000055291 887__ $$ahttp://purl.umn.edu/55291
000055291 909CO $$ooai:ageconsearch.umn.edu:55291$$qGLOBAL_SET
000055291 912__ $$nSubmitted by Nancy Elera (nancy.elera@feem.it) on 2009-11-26T15:59:40Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
92-09.pdf: 582547 bytes, checksum: b26495b6b1b199f9d3162af98ef0f465 (MD5)
000055291 912__ $$nMade available in DSpace on 2009-11-26T15:59:41Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
92-09.pdf: 582547 bytes, checksum: b26495b6b1b199f9d3162af98ef0f465 (MD5)
  Previous issue date: 2009
000055291 982__ $$gFondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM)>Sustainable Development Papers
000055291 980__ $$a838