JAPANESE MILLERS' PREFERENCES FOR WHEAT AND FLOUR: A STATED PREFERENCE ANALYSIS

Japan imports 6.3 MMT of wheat annually and consumes almost 35 percent of this in the form of noodles. The purpose of this paper is to report on a study that evaluates the preferences of Japanese millers for the various characteristics of wheat and flour that are used in noodle making in Japan. The study used stated preference methodologies (SPM), that were developed and pre-tested through initial interviews with Japanese flour millers. In total, 57 purchase and quality managers for 22 Japanese milling companies were surveyed by means of direct interviews and 41 respondents completed the full SPM survey. Multinomial logit models of millersÂ’ preferences were developed and tested and the parameter estimates of these are reported in the paper. This elicited their choices of wheat and flour with alternative combinations of characteristics, at specified levels, for various wheat classes and noodle flours. Data were also collected on stated choices for wheat sourced from different origins. Millers prefer wheat with test weights of minimum 80, dockage below 0.4 percent and falling numbers above 250. Preferences for protein, ash and color were specific for different wheat classes and for use in different noodle flours. Millers also display a preference for amylograph at minimum of 400 BU for noodle flour. For hard wheat millers preferred wheat of U.S. and Canadian origin, but for semi-hard and medium wheat, they preferred Australian origin wheat. These results may assist wheat breeders and traders in exporting nations in marketing their products and positioning these in this important and premium wheat market.


Issue Date:
2000
Publication Type:
Conference Paper/ Presentation
PURL Identifier:
http://purl.umn.edu/36403
Total Pages:
12
Series Statement:
Selected Paper of the 2000 Annual Meeting, June 29-July 1, 2000, Vancouver, British Columbia




 Record created 2017-04-01, last modified 2017-11-24

Fulltext:
Download fulltext
PDF

Rate this document:

Rate this document:
1
2
3
 
(Not yet reviewed)