AN ANALYSIS OF TWO ALTERNATIVE FUNDING SOURCES FOR NORTHEAST BANKS LENDING TO AGRICULTURE

A survey of agricultural banks in New York State found that inability to compete with the low interest rates offered by the Farm Credit Service (FCS) rather than the unavailability of funds per se was limiting agricultural lending by commercial banks. A MASI-like intermediary would (1) be of assistance only to banks unable to use loan participations and with high CD costs and (2) would likely require a large multistate area to be feasible. Only eight percent of the New York banks serving agriculture qualify for FICB funding. Further, FICB funding would be profitable only if banks experienced illiquidity at least 50 percent of the time.


Issue Date:
1985-4
Publication Type:
Journal Article
PURL Identifier:
http://purl.umn.edu/28933
Published in:
Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Volume 14, Number 1
Page range:
78-87
Total Pages:
10




 Record created 2017-04-01, last modified 2017-08-24

Fulltext:
Download fulltext
PDF

Rate this document:

Rate this document:
1
2
3
 
(Not yet reviewed)