000028725 001__ 28725
000028725 005__ 20180122203735.0
000028725 037__ $$a1236-2016-101369
000028725 041__ $$aen
000028725 260__ $$c2003
000028725 269__ $$a2003
000028725 300__ $$a51
000028725 336__ $$aWorking or Discussion Paper
000028725 446__ $$aEnglish
000028725 490__ $$aGTAP Technical Paper No. 21
000028725 520__ $$aDuty drawback schemes, which typically involve a combination of duty rebates and exemptions, are a feature of many countries' trade regimes. They are used in highly protected, developing economies as means of providing exporters with imported inputs at world prices, and thus increasing their competitiveness, while maintaining the protection on the rest of the economy. In China duty exemptions have been central to the process of trade reform and have led to a tremendous increase in processed exports utilizing imported materials. Despite the widespread use and importance of duty drawbacks, these "new trade liberalization" instruments have been given relatively little attention in empirical multilateral trade liberalization studies.  This paper presents an empirical multi-region trade model GTAP-DD, an extension of GTAP, in which the effects of policy reform are differentiated based on the trade-orientation of the firms. Both GTAP and GTAP-DD are used to analyze the impact of China's WTO accession, which involves liberalization in China from 1997 to post-accession tariffs among a number of other liberalization measures. The analysis shows that failure to account of duty exemptions in the case of China's recent WTO accession will overstate the increase in : (a) China's trade flows by 40 percent, (b) China's welfare by 15 percent, and (c) exports of selected sectors by as much as 90 percent. The magnitude of the bias depends on the level of pre-intervention tariffs and the size of tariff cuts - the larger the initial distortions and tariff reductions, the larger the bias when duty drawbacks are ignored. The bias in GTAP's estimates of China's real GDP, trade flows and welfare changes due to WTO accession increases more three times when China's pre-intervention tariffs are raised from their 1997 levels to the much higher 1995 levels. These results suggest that trade liberalization studies focusing on economies in which protection is high, import concessions play an important role and planned tariff cuts are deep, must treat duty drawbacks explicitly in order to avoid serious errors in their estimates of sectoral, trade flows and welfare changes.
000028725 650__ $$aInternational Relations/Trade
000028725 700__ $$aIanchovichina, Elena
000028725 8564_ $$s182119$$uhttp://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/28725/files/tp030021.pdf
000028725 887__ $$ahttp://purl.umn.edu/28725
000028725 909CO $$ooai:ageconsearch.umn.edu:28725$$pGLOBAL_SET
000028725 912__ $$nMade available in DSpace on 2007-03-07T17:41:14Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
tp030021.pdf: 182119 bytes, checksum: 83a5e840256aca42c7619765f93d6f2f (MD5)
  Previous issue date: 2003
000028725 982__ $$gPurdue University>Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project>Technical Papers
000028725 980__ $$a1236