000023836 001__ 23836
000023836 005__ 20180122202616.0
000023836 037__ $$a1753-2016-141145
000023836 037__ $$a1753-2016-141510
000023836 041__ $$aen
000023836 245__ $$aReform of Agricultural Export Credit Programs
000023836 260__ $$c2000
000023836 269__ $$a2000
000023836 300__ $$a13
000023836 336__ $$aJournal Article
000023836 446__ $$aEnglish
000023836 520__ $$aThis paper examines whether government-sponsored export credit arrangements have the same effect on trade as direct export subsidies. The export credit programs for several major agricultural exporters are described. These programs are compared to OECD disciplines for export credit arrangements, and the consequences of extending these guidelines to agriculture are analysed. None of the programs discussed would be consistent with the OECD guidelines. Since export credit arrangements have many of the same characteristics as targeted export subsidies, the same analytical framework can be used to analyse these programs. However, it is necessary to determine implicit subsidy values for the program.
000023836 650__ $$aInternational Relations/Trade
000023836 6531_ $$aexport credit
000023836 6531_ $$aexport subsidy
000023836 6531_ $$aprice discrimination
000023836 6531_ $$aWTO
000023836 700__ $$aRude, James
000023836 773__ $$dSpring 2000$$jVolume 01$$kNumber 2$$o78$$q66$$tEstey Journal of International Law and Trade Policy
000023836 8564_ $$s70847$$uhttp://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/23836/files/01010066.pdf
000023836 887__ $$ahttp://purl.umn.edu/23836
000023836 909CO $$ooai:ageconsearch.umn.edu:23836$$pGLOBAL_SET
000023836 912__ $$nMade available in DSpace on 2007-03-07T20:13:27Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
01010066.pdf: 70847 bytes, checksum: f601326a0da94c9532a8bd35a6f5e4ee (MD5)
  Previous issue date: 2000
000023836 982__ $$gEstey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy>Volume 01, Number 01, Spring 2000
000023836 980__ $$a1753