000234412 001__ 234412
000234412 005__ 20180123004029.0
000234412 037__ $$a398-2016-24420
000234412 041__ $$aen_US
000234412 245__ $$aAre We Killing the Golden Sheep? The Changing Size and Composition of the Australian Sheep Flock: Implications for Production and Profitability
000234412 260__ $$c2015
000234412 269__ $$a2015
000234412 300__ $$a21
000234412 336__ $$aWorking or Discussion Paper
000234412 490__ $$aPaper
000234412 490__ $$a101
000234412 520__ $$aThe changing fortunes of the Australian sheepmeat and wool sectors have led to dramatic changes to the national flock. In recent years the profitability of the sheepmeat sector has provided mixed signals to producers to simultaneously sell to capitalise on high prices, particularly for mutton and breeding stock, while also shifting enterprises towards dual purpose (meat and wool) and specialist lamb production systems.
This essay provides a summary of changes to the Australian sheep flock in the past twenty years, including the growth of the sheepmeat sector and the decline of the wool sector. It considers drivers of profitability in the sheep industry, comparing the recent economic performance of prime lamb, dual purpose, and wool flocks. It is suggested that there are a number of common factors evident in the most profitable sheep businesses. A discussion about risk management and volatility helps explain the rise of dual production systems, the persistence of risk-averse wool enterprises, and highly productive but volatile returns for specialist prime lamb producers. Flock structure is identified a major determinant of profitability, with breeding ewes critical to production.
The challenges posed will also shape the future of the Australian sheep flock. Fertility and drought-induced sell-off are noted as major factors affecting changes to the Australian flock, which could be exacerbated by an increasingly variable and extreme climate.
Finally, this essay considers the future size and composition of the Australian sheep flock. A flock structure model is used to estimate the effects of hypothetical changes to marking and slaughter rates.
It is concluded that it remains possible to sustain production and kill the 'Golden Sheep', provided there is a focus on productivity and reproduction efficiency to ‘optimise’ the remaining flock.
000234412 542__ $$fLicense granted by Deanna Kanne (kanne053@umn.edu) on 2016-04-19T17:25:40Z (GMT):

<p class="ds-paragraph">
By depositing this Content ("Content") in AgEcon Search, I agree that I am 
solely responsible for any consequences of uploading this Content to AgEcon 
Search and making it publicly available, and I represent and warrant that:

I am either the sole creator and the owner of the copyrights and all other 
rights in the Content; or, without obtaining another’s permission, I have the 
right to deposit the Content in an archive such as AgEcon Search.

To the extent that any portions of the Content are not my own creation, they 
are used with the copyright holder’s express permission or as permitted by law.
 Additionally, the Content does not infringe the copyrights or other 
intellectual property rights of another, nor does the Content violate any 
laws or another’s rights of privacy or publicity.

The Content contains no restricted, private, confidential, or otherwise 
protected data or information that should not be publicly shared.

I understand that AgEcon Search will do its best to provide perpetual access
 to my Content. In order to support these efforts, I grant the Regents of the
 University of Minnesota ("University"), through AgEcon Search, the following
 non-exclusive, irrevocable, royalty-free, world-wide rights and licenses:

to access, reproduce, distribute and publicly display the Content, in whole
 or in part, in order to secure, preserve and make it publicly available, and

to make derivative works based upon the Content in order to migrate the
 Content to other media or formats, or to preserve its public access.

These terms do not transfer ownership of the copyright(s) in the Content.
 These terms only grant to the University the limited license outlined above.
</p>

000234412 650__ $$aLivestock Production/Industries
000234412 700__ $$aPerrett, Edward
000234412 8564_ $$s1175341$$uhttp://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/234412/files/Paper%20101.pdf
000234412 887__ $$ahttp://purl.umn.edu/234412
000234412 909CO $$ooai:ageconsearch.umn.edu:234412$$pGLOBAL_SET
000234412 912__ $$nSubmitted by Deanna Kanne (kanne053@umn.edu) on 2016-04-19T17:28:11Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
Paper 101.pdf: 1175341 bytes, checksum: 3fd19dc187517be5c18b8344dd289fd5 (MD5)
000234412 912__ $$nMade available in DSpace on 2016-04-19T17:28:11Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
Paper 101.pdf: 1175341 bytes, checksum: 3fd19dc187517be5c18b8344dd289fd5 (MD5)
  Previous issue date: 2015
000234412 982__ $$gAustralasian Agribusiness Perspectives>Papers
000234412 980__ $$a398