Files
Abstract
This study highlights that even though water for irrigation substantially contributes to production of
principal crops, the cost of cultivation discounts its role, since it does not incorporate the cost of irrigation
water in the cost of cultivation methodology followed by Directorate of Economics and
Statistics/Commission for Agricultural Costs and Prices (DES-CACP). The study suggests modifications
in data and methodology in estimating cost of cultivation of crops considering the field data from
Karnataka. Estimating the net returns from the DES Cost of Cultivation Scheme data for TE 2008-10
according to market prices, economic prices and natural resource valuation (including cost of water), the
study highlights that the extent of under estimation of cost of cultivation varies from 16 per cent to 49 per
cent of the cost of cultivation in the case of groundwater irrigated crops and 4 per cent to 14 per cent in the
case of canal irrigated crops. The minimum support price (MSP) offered did not include the cost of
irrigation water of the principal crops cultivated in Karnataka. The study also suggests focusing on
removal of market imperfections in addition to an MSP which properly accounts for cost of irrigation
water, to enable farmers to reap a favourable proportion of consumer’s rupee.