Files
Abstract
Willingness to pay (WTP) for public goods is often spatially heterogeneous; the relevance of this
heterogeneity for policy analysis is increasingly recognized. Within stated preference (SP) analysis,
the most commonly analyzed form of spatial heterogeneity is distance decay, in which WTP
is assumed to diminish as a monotonic function of distance from the affected resource. This distance
is typically calculated from each respondent’s household to the nearest point of the affected
resource, using either Euclidean or travel distance. A small but increasing literature, however, now
suggests the limitations of a simple distance decay paradigm as the sole means to evaluate spatial
heterogeneity. This article illustrates a novel approach to account for spatial welfare heterogeneity
that may better capture the systematic sensitivity of preferences to resource proximity. The model
accounts for the amount of the affected resource surrounding each respondent’s home location,
at distance bands of varying length, rather than the distance to the closest point. This alternative
“quantity-within-distance-x” measure is used as a substitute for the common “distance-to-nearestpoint”
measure with distance-related models of spatial welfare heterogeneity. Methods and results
are illustrated using a choice experiment addressing preferences for riparian land restoration in
south coastal Maine. Results suggest that the resulting models better capture spatial elements
relevant to respondents’ preferences. Comparison to standard distance decay models shows the
additional insight provided by this novel approach.