Relative Risk Perception and the Puzzle of Covered Call Writing

Market professionals with decades of experience typically argue that a call option is a surrogate for the underlying asset, indicating that they perceive the risk of a call option as similar to the risk of the underlying asset. Experimental evidence also points to the same conclusion. Such relative risk perception is in sharp contrast with finance theory, which argues that only the absolute quantity of risk contained in a call option should matter for its price. I show that relative risk perception provides a potential explanation for the puzzling performance of covered call writing.


Issue Date:
2015-03
Publication Type:
Working or Discussion Paper
PURL Identifier:
http://purl.umn.edu/199882
Total Pages:
15
JEL Codes:
G13; G12; G02
Series Statement:
Finance
WPF15_3




 Record created 2017-04-01, last modified 2017-08-28

Fulltext:
Download fulltext
PDF

Rate this document:

Rate this document:
1
2
3
 
(Not yet reviewed)