000019438 001__ 19438
000019438 005__ 20180122201425.0
000019438 037__ $$a378-2016-21271
000019438 041__ $$aen
000019438 245__ $$aDo MILC Program Payments Affect Milk Supply Response Across Regions of the U.S.?
000019438 260__ $$c2005
000019438 269__ $$a2005
000019438 270__ $$mherndon@agecon.msstate.edu$$pHerndon,   Cary W.
000019438 270__ $$mbld4@agecon.msstate.edu$$pDavis,   Brandon
000019438 270__ $$mparkhurst@agecon.msstate.edu$$pParkhurst,   Gregory
000019438 300__ $$a13
000019438 336__ $$aConference Paper/ Presentation
000019438 446__ $$aEnglish
000019438 490__ $$aSelected Paper 135910
000019438 520__ $$aThis paper assesses the impact of the milk income loss contract program on U.S. dairy producers. The Milk Income Loss Contact (MILC) program was created through the 2002 farm bill, which financially compensates dairy producers when domestic milk prices fall below a predetermined Boston Class I trigger price. MILC payments were made to eligible dairy producers/farms on a per cwt basis at a rate equal to 45 percent of the difference between the trigger price of $16.94 and the Boston Class I milk price.  
In the analysis, the 20 major milk-producing states were analyzed to determine if MILC payments caused a milk supply response to be different across these states. By dividing the U.S. into states, this will give a better understanding of production decisions based on the availability of inputs.  To test the hypothesis, milk production was regressed against each state's All Milk price, MILC payments, production trends, the milk-feed price ratio, and average productivity per dairy farm in each state. Data were collected over an 10-year period (1995-2004), and MILC variable was used as a dummy variable in the model. The a priori expectations suggest that, in certain states, MILC payments will dampen the state's milk supply response to low milk prices.  However, results may also help explain why a state increased or decreased milk production after the implementation of the MILC program. 
Of the 20-states, those dairies located in the west and southwest regions of the U.S. experienced the largest increases of production during the selected eight years. OLS regression results obtained from the individual state models report mixed results and generally failed to support the hypothesis that MILC did alter the response of monthly milk production to All Milk prices.
000019438 650__ $$aAgricultural and Food Policy
000019438 6531_ $$aDairy markets
000019438 6531_ $$aMILC
000019438 6531_ $$aMilk prices
000019438 6531_ $$aMilk supply response
000019438 700__ $$aHerndon, Cary W., Jr.
000019438 700__ $$aDavis, Brandon L.
000019438 700__ $$aParkhurst, Gregory M.
000019438 8564_ $$s150630$$uhttp://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/19438/files/sp05he06.pdf
000019438 887__ $$ahttp://purl.umn.edu/19438
000019438 909CO $$ooai:ageconsearch.umn.edu:19438$$pGLOBAL_SET
000019438 912__ $$nMade available in DSpace on 2007-03-07T22:57:24Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
sp05he06.pdf: 150630 bytes, checksum: aa08b25c06d8041ca3d6c79f924ad32d (MD5)
  Previous issue date: 2005
000019438 982__ $$gAmerican Agricultural Economics Association>2005 Annual meeting, July 24-27, Providence, RI
000019438 980__ $$a378