Files
Abstract
Utilizing social norms is gaining momentum as a cost-effective mechanism to promote sustainable behavior. We analyze household water data from multiple pilot programs for a
company that provides information campaigns containing social comparisons of water use and personalized conservation recommendations in order to reduce household water consumption. We find significant treatment effect heterogeneity across the distribution of consumption and environmental
attitudes. In the two pilots with a full year of data one utility achieves savings of 6.5%; while the
other in aggregate achieved limited conservation gains. Heterogeneity based on the distribution of
consumption is more important in the utility with significant savings, with the highest users saving
the most water. In contrast ideology appears to be more important in the utility with an insignificant average treatment effect with dis-savings for those with very low environmental preferences
and strong savings for the most environmentally-conscious. Inter-regional ideology may play an
critical role since the utility with significant savings is in a much "greener" community, whereas
intra-utility ideology is influential in conservative areas. We caution interpretation of the results,
particularly for Utility B, as the data are still incomplete.