Files
Abstract
We extend Brander-Taylor's model of development on Easter Island by adding
a resource subsistence requirement to people's preferences, and a conservation incentive in
the form of a revenue-neutral, ad valorem tax on resource consumption. Adding subsistence
improves plausibility; makes overshoot and collapse of population more extreme, and the steady
state less stable; and allows for the possibility that statue building and erection will suddenly
stop, in line with the archaeological evidence. We explore a tax rate path which could have
almost completely prevented overshoot, and conjecture that the overall strength of this path
must rise when the subsistence level rises.