Files
Abstract
A mail survey is used to examine the consistency of alternative risk preference elicitation
procedures using five commonly used methods. These elicitation procedures have been
used in previous studies to characterise risk preference. Results show little consistency
across procedures, supporting strength-of-preference studies. A general recommendation
for mail surveys is the development of relatively easy-to-understand risk-preference
elicitation procedures that are framed according to the situational construct in question.