000010909 001__ 10909
000010909 005__ 20180122194120.0
000010909 037__ $$a1318-2016-103269
000010909 041__ $$aen
000010909 084__ $$aQ28
000010909 245__ $$aExperience with Market-Based Environmental Policy Instruments
000010909 260__ $$c2001
000010909 269__ $$a2001
000010909 300__ $$a92
000010909 336__ $$aWorking or Discussion Paper
000010909 446__ $$aEnglish
000010909 490__ $$aDiscussion Paper 01-58
000010909 520__ $$aEnvironmental policies typically combine the identification of a goal with some means to achieve that goal. This chapter for the forthcoming Handbook of Environmental Economics focuses exclusively on the second component, the means - the "instruments" - of environmental policy, and considers, in particular, experience around the world with the relatively new breed of economic-incentive or market-based policy instruments. I define these instruments broadly, and consider them within four categories: charge systems; tradable permits; market friction reductions; and government subsidy reductions. Within charge systems, I consider: effluent charges, deposit-refund systems, user charges, insurance premium taxes, sales taxes, administrative charges, and tax differentiation. Within tradeable permit systems, I consider both credit programs and cap-and-trade systems. Under the heading of reducing market frictions, I examine: market creation, liability rules, and information programs. Finally, under reducing government subsidies, I review a number of specific examples from around the world. By defining market-based instruments broadly, I cast a large net for this review of applications. As a consequence, the review is extensive. But this should not leave the impression that market-based instruments have replaced, or have come anywhere close to replacing, the conventional, command-and-control approach to environmental protection. Further, even where these approaches have been used in their purest form and with some success, such as in the case of tradeable-permit systems in the United States, they have not always performed as anticipated. In the final part of the paper, I ask what lessons can be learned from our experiences. In particular, I consider normative lessons for: design and implementation; analysis of prospective and adopted systems; and identification of new applications.
000010909 650__ $$aEnvironmental Economics and Policy
000010909 6531_ $$amarket-based policy
000010909 6531_ $$aeconomic incentives
000010909 6531_ $$atradable permits
000010909 6531_ $$aemission taxes
000010909 700__ $$aStavins, Robert N.
000010909 8564_ $$s363259$$uhttp://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/10909/files/dp010058.pdf
000010909 887__ $$ahttp://purl.umn.edu/10909
000010909 909CO $$ooai:ageconsearch.umn.edu:10909$$pGLOBAL_SET
000010909 912__ $$nMade available in DSpace on 2007-03-08T04:18:03Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
dp010058.pdf: 363259 bytes, checksum: 671933376e1310e2e31741b004fd1fe8 (MD5)
  Previous issue date: 2001
000010909 982__ $$gResources for the Future>Discussion Papers
000010909 980__ $$a1318