AgEcon Search

AgEcon Search >
       Journal of Agribusiness >
          Volume 16, Number 1, Spring 1998 >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

Title: How Do Ratite Meats Compare with Beef?: Implications for the Ratite Industry
Authors: Taylor, Gary
Andrews, Linda
Gillespie, Jeffrey M.
Schupp, Alvin R.
Prinyawiwatkul, Witoon
Keywords: Acceptability
Difference from control
Sensory quality
Issue Date: 1998
Abstract: Emu and ostrich meats were compared with beef to identify and quantify their sensory attributes. A sensory panel was used to compare U.S. Department of Agriculture Choice top sirloin beef with emu and ostrich meat, both ground and intact forms. Comparisons of sensory quality and acceptability were made after zero, two, four and six months of frozen storage. Differences in flavor, juiciness and texture were detected between ratite meats and beef (the control). The differences were more pronounced for intact cuts than ground meat, with ratite meat usually being rated inferior to beef. Some differences in sensory acceptability across the sic-month storage period were revealed. Implications for marketing the ratite meats are made based upon the study.
Identifiers: 0738-8950
Institution/Association: Journal of Agribusiness>Volume 16, Number 1, Spring 1998
Total Pages: 18
From Page: 97
To Page: 114
Collections:Volume 16, Number 1, Spring 1998

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
Recommend this item

All items in AgEcon Search are protected by copyright.



Brought to you by the University of Minnesota Department of Applied Economics and the University of Minnesota Libraries with cooperation from the Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.

All papers are in Acrobat (.pdf) format. Get Adobe Reader

Contact Us

Powered by: