|
AgEcon Search >
Marine Resource Economics >
Volume 17, Number 2, 2002 >
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://purl.umn.edu/28089
|
| Title: | AQUACULTURE AND THE FUTURE: WHY FISHERIES ECONOMISTS SHOULD CARE |
| Authors: | Anderson, James L. |
| Issue Date: | 2002 |
| Abstract: | This paper explores the relationship between traditional fisheries, fisheries enhancement (ranching), and aquaculture. It evaluates why they are different and why fisheries economists have largely neglected aquaculture issues, despite the fact that most of the growth in fish supply over the past two decades has been the result of aquaculture development. It is argued that the core difference between aquaculture and traditional fisheries is the degree of control; control of the environment, production, and marketing systems. It is further argued that the degree of control is closely related to the strength of property rights. Three examples are presented to provide empirical support for the propositions. They focus on the salmon, lobster, and shrimp industries. |
| URI: | http://purl.umn.edu/28089 |
| Institution/Association: | Marine Resource Economics>Volume 17, Number 2, 2002 |
| Total Pages: | 19 |
| Language: | English |
| From Page: | 133 |
| To Page: | 151 |
| Collections: | Volume 17, Number 2, 2002
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Size | Format |
|---|
| 17020133.pdf | 151Kb | PDF | View/Open |
|
Recommend this item
All items in AgEcon Search are protected by copyright.
|
