AgEcon Search

AgEcon Search >
       Journal of Food Distribution Research >
          Volume 28, Number 2, July 1997 >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

Authors: Manalo, Alberto B.
Gempesaw, Conrado M., II
Issue Date: 1997-07
Abstract: In a mail survey of shellfish consumers in the U. S. Northeast, a conjoint experiment was conducted where respondents were asked to rank oyster alternatives that differed on the following attributes: source information, price, and inspection information. Ordered probit analysis of all responses revealed that inspection information was the most important attribute, followed by source information, and price. Respondents most preferred oysters that were farm- raised, priced at $3.49/oz., and inspected by the Food and Drug Administration. Individual part- worths were also estimated using ordinary least squares regression. Logit analysis revealed that the probability of inspection information being the most-valued attribute increased when the respondent believed that farm-raised shellfish are harvested in cleaner water than those caught in the wild. The probability of source information being the most important attribute increased when the respondent believed that farm-raised shellfish are safer than wild-caught.
Institution/Association: Journal of Food Distribution Research>Volume 28, Number 2, July 1997
Total Pages: 9
Language: English
From Page: 55
To Page: 63
Collections:Volume 28, Number 2, July 1997

Files in This Item:

File SizeFormat
Recommend this item

All items in AgEcon Search are protected by copyright.



Brought to you by the University of Minnesota Department of Applied Economics and the University of Minnesota Libraries with cooperation from the Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.

All papers are in Acrobat (.pdf) format. Get Adobe Reader

Contact Us

Powered by: