AgEcon Search

AgEcon Search >
       University of Victoria >
          Resource Economics and Policy Analysis Research Group >
             Working Papers >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

Title: The Policy Challenge of Creating Forest Offset Credits: A Case Study from the Interior of British Columbia
Authors: van Kooten, G. Cornelis
Authors (Email): van Kooten, G. Cornelis (
Keywords: climate change mitigation and forestry
carbon offsets and taxes
carbon life-cycle analysis
biomass energy
wood products versus cement and steel
forest rotation age
JEL Codes: H23
Issue Date: 2017-03
Series/Report no.: REPA Working Paper
Abstract: This paper provides an overview of the role that forestry activities can play in mitigating climate change. The price of carbon offset credits is used for incentivizing a reduction in the release of CO2 emissions and an increase in sequestration of atmospheric CO2 through forestry activities. Forestland owners essentially have two options for creating carbon offset credits: (1) avoid or delay harvest of mature timber; or (2) harvest timber and allow natural regeneration or regeneration with ‘regular’ or genetically-enhanced growing stock, storing carbon in post-harvest products, using sawmill and potentially logging residues to generate electricity. In this study, a model representative of the Quesnel Timber Supply Area (TSA) in the BC interior is developed. The objective is to maximize net discounted returns to commercial timber operations (and sale of downstream products) plus the benefits of managing carbon fluxes. The model tracks carbon in living trees, organic matter, and, importantly, post-harvest carbon pools and avoided emissions from substituting wood for non-wood in construction or wood bioenergy for fossil fuels. Model constraints ensure that commercial forest management is sustainable, while carbon prices incentivize sequestration to ensure efficient mitigation of climate change. The results are confirmed more generally by comparing the carbon fluxes derived from the integrated forest management model with those from a Faustmann-Hartman rotation age model that explicitly includes benefits of storing carbon. One other question is addressed: If carbon offsets are created when wood biomass substitutes for fossil fuels in power generation, can one count the saved emissions from steel/cement production when wood substitutes for non-wood materials in construction?
Institution/Association: University of Victoria>Resource Economics and Policy Analysis Research Group>Working Papers
Total Pages: 35
Collections:Working Papers

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
Recommend this item

All items in AgEcon Search are protected by copyright.



Brought to you by the University of Minnesota Department of Applied Economics and the University of Minnesota Libraries with cooperation from the Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.

All papers are in Acrobat (.pdf) format. Get Adobe Reader

Contact Us

Powered by: