AgEcon Search >
American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association) >
2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO >
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title: ||TESTING THE PECKING ORDER THEORY AND THE SIGNALING THEORY FOR FARM BUSINESSES|
|Authors: ||Zhao, Jianmei|
Katchova, Ani L.
Barry, Peter J.
|Authors (Email): ||Zhao, Jianmei (email@example.com)|
Katchova, Ani L. (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Barry, Peter J. (email@example.com)
|Keywords: ||Farm Businesses|
Pecking Order Theory
|JEL Codes: ||Q14|
|Issue Date: ||2004|
|Series/Report no.: ||Selected Paper|
|Abstract: ||Numerous empirical studies in the finance field have tested many theories for firms¡¦ capital structure. Under the assumption of asymmetric information, the pecking order theory proposes the financing order for farm businesses, which implies a negative relationship between their cash flow and leverage. Meanwhile, the signaling theory suggests a farms' financing strategy, meaning high quality farms prefer to facilitate their capital rising by sending diverse signals to potential lenders. Could these capital structure theories be applied for farm businesses?
This paper tests the applicability of the pecking order theory and the signaling theory for farm businesses. The results show that farm businesses not only follow the pecking order theory but also the signaling theory. In addition, unlike corporate firms who can choose high leverage as financing signals, farm businesses mainly depend on their large size and good historical operation records to facilitate investment financing.|
|Institution/Association: ||American Agricultural Economics Association>2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO|
|Total Pages: ||32|
|Collections:||2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO|
Recommend this item
Files in This Item:
All items in AgEcon Search are protected by copyright.