AgEcon Search

AgEcon Search >
       Agricultural and Applied Economics Association (formerly the American Agricultural Economics Association) >
          2013 Annual Meeting, August 4-6, 2013, Washington, D.C. >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

Title: Biofortification, crop adoption and health information: Impact pathways in Mozambique and Uganda
Authors: Brauw, Alan de
Eozenou, Patrick
Gilligan, Daniel O.
Hotz, Christine
Kumar, Neha
Meenakshi, J.V.
Authors (Email): Brauw, Alan de (
Gilligan, Daniel O. (
Kumar, Neha (
Eozenou, Patrick (
Keywords: Biofortification
Impact Evaluation
Randomized Control Trial
Technology Adoption
Program Evaluation
Program Design
JEL Codes: O1
Issue Date: 2013
Abstract: Biofortification, breeding staple food crops to be dense sources of essential micronutrients, is fast emerging as a strategy to fight micronutrient malnutrition. Large scale biofortification investments are being made in several developing countries, but until recently little rigorous evidence about the impact of these investments has been available. In this paper, we report findings from randomized impact evaluations conducted in both Mozambique and Uganda to study the impact of large-scale pilot projects conducted between 2006 and 2009 to introduce provitamin-A-rich orange-fleshed sweet potato (OFSP) as a strategy to reduce vitamin A deficiency. In both countries, projects randomly assigned interventions of different cost and intensity to distribute OFSP vines, train households to grow OFSP, and disseminate the health benefits of vitamin A. We compare the impact of the interventions within and across the two countries on OFSP adoption, knowledge about vitamin A, and dietary intake of vitamin A by children, and use causal mediation analysis (Imai et al. 2011) to examine the impact pathways on vitamin A consumption. After two years of intervention, in both countries the project led to OFSP adoption rates of 61-68 percent among project households, improved household knowledge about vitamin A, and nearly doubled average dietary intake of vitamin A, with no difference between the more and less intense intervention models. Evidence suggests that vine access played the most important role in explaining the impact on vitamin A consumption in both countries. Consequently, future programs can be designed to have similar impacts at even lower costs
Institution/Association: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association>2013 Annual Meeting, August 4-6, 2013, Washington, D.C.
Total Pages: 69
Collections:2013 Annual Meeting, August 4-6, 2013, Washington, D.C.

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
de Brauw et al AAEA.pdfPaper1650KbPDFView/Open
Recommend this item

All items in AgEcon Search are protected by copyright.



Brought to you by the University of Minnesota Department of Applied Economics and the University of Minnesota Libraries with cooperation from the Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.

All papers are in Acrobat (.pdf) format. Get Adobe Reader

Contact Us

Powered by: