AgEcon Search

AgEcon Search >
       University of Minnesota >
          Department of Applied Economics >
             Staff Papers >

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://purl.umn.edu/13919

Title: ESTIMATING TRANSACTION COSTS OF ALTERNATIVE POLICIES TO REDUCE PHOSPHOROUS POLLUTION IN THE MINNESOTA RIVER
Authors: McCann, Laura M.J.
Easter, K. William
Authors (Email): Easter, K. William (weaster@dept.agecon.umn.edu)
Issue Date: 1998
Series/Report no.: Staff Paper P98-7
Abstract: As point sources of pollution reduce their emissions due to water quality control efforts, nonpoint sources have become relatively more important. In the case of agricultural nonpoint source pollution, the policy instruments recommended by economists are not observed in practice. This study was designed to measure the magnitude of transaction costs associated with policies to reduce agricultural nonpoint source pollution and to determine whether transaction costs help explain the prevalence of the policies actually observed. Interviews with staff from governmental agencies were conducted to estimate transaction costs associated with four policies to reduce agricultural phosphorous pollution in the Minnesota River. The tax on phosphate fertilizers had the lowest transaction costs (U.S. $0.94 million), followed by educational programs on best management practices ($3.11 million), the requirement for conservation tillage on all cropped land ($7.85 million), and expansion of a permanent conservation easement program ($9.37 million). Taxes thus may have advantages with respect to transaction costs as well as abatement costs.
URI: http://purl.umn.edu/13919
Institution/Association: University of Minnesota>Department of Applied Economics>Staff Papers
Total Pages: 30
Language: English
Collections:Staff Papers

Files in This Item:

File SizeFormat
p98-07.pdf172KbPDFView/Open
Recommend this item

All items in AgEcon Search are protected by copyright.

 

 

Brought to you by the University of Minnesota Department of Applied Economics and the University of Minnesota Libraries with cooperation from the Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.

All papers are in Acrobat (.pdf) format. Get Adobe Reader

Contact Us

Powered by: