|
AgEcon Search >
New Zealand Agricultural and Resource Economics Society >
2012 Conference, August 31, 2012, Nelson, New Zealand >
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://purl.umn.edu/136072
|
| Title: | Cost Benefit Approaches to Valuing Nature: Case Studies in New Zealand |
| Authors: | Wilson, Ross |
| Keywords: | evaluation
monetised
council
cost benefit analysis
RMA section 32 |
| Issue Date: | 2012-08 |
| Abstract: | Section 32 of the Resource Management Act requires councils to evaluate the alternative options. Pure, fully monetised cost benefit analysis (“CBA”) is in theory the ideal preferred approach for evaluations, but it is at one extreme of a whole spectrum of related approaches based on the level of detail and quantification or monetisation.
In practice, few if any s32 analyses are fully monetised, and in fact many if not most are either purely qualitative (descriptions or matrices) or a mix of qualitative and quantitative (numerical or scoring). However, there are other examples across the entire spectrum. |
| URI: | http://purl.umn.edu/136072 |
| Institution/Association: | New Zealand Agricultural and Resource Economics Society>2012 Conference, August 31, 2012, Nelson, New Zealand |
| Total Pages: | 24 |
| Collections: | 2012 Conference, August 31, 2012, Nelson, New Zealand
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format |
|---|
| Wilson 2012 complete.pdf | | 884Kb | PDF | View/Open |
|
Recommend this item
All items in AgEcon Search are protected by copyright.
|
